2012 Elections in the USA

[QUOTE=El Alamo; 427284]I have been telling you for months what Obama's grades were. Acumulative 1. 57 GPA with numerous stents on academic probation for lack of academic achievment (read lack of intelligence)

And the biggest hoax is that Obama claims he was cumma sum laude or some similar nonsense at Harvard. The best thing Obama's professors could say about Obama at Harvard was that when Obama quit selling drugs and quit using drugs Obama was able to raise his academic standard to D level.

Wow! I always thought I was just lucky. Now I get it. I wasn't lucky. I made my money off the stupidity of others. And in this world there is nobody as stupid as an Obama supporter. It takes an unique and total lack of intelligence to fall for a transpàrent fraude, fake and huckster such as Obama.[/QUOTE]The fact is, Columbia University lists Obama as having graduated with academic honors. I never heard Obama claim anything of the kind with respect to Harvard, but the Law Review officers are chosen by a combination of their academic standing and a vote of their peers in their class. One needs to be academically accomplished amongst their peers within Harvard Law School, as well as have superior interpersonal skills to be selected as the President of the Law Review.

[QUOTE=El Alamo; 427284]I have been telling you for months what Obama's grades were. Acumulative 1. 57 GPA with numerous stents on academic probation for lack of academic achievment (read lack of intelligence)

And the biggest hoax is that Obama claims he was cumma sum laude or some similar nonsense at Harvard. The best thing Obama's professors could say about Obama at Harvard was that when Obama quit selling drugs and quit using drugs Obama was able to raise his academic standard to D level.

Wow! I always thought I was just lucky. Now I get it. I wasn't lucky. I made my money off the stupidity of others. And in this world there is nobody as stupid as an Obama supporter. It takes an unique and total lack of intelligence to fall for a transpàrent fraude, fake and huckster such as Obama.[/QUOTE]Either your tin foil hat is on too tight, or you must be a buyer and heavy consumer of hallucinogens. In either case, you have my pity.

As an aside, you right wingers might find that people respected you and your arguments quite a bit more if you weren't coming from some sort of alternative reality that is complete and ridiculous fiction:

To wit: Try to actually make your case on the merits - there certainly IS a legitimate case to be made about the relative economic merits of Obama's programs compared to Romney's - although for sure, the more Romney shies away from specifics, the harder it is to make that case. If you wish to claim there are better approaches to foreign policy, go ahead and make them.

But, claiming stupid batshit crazy stuff, like Obama is a Kenyan, Obama is a Muslim, Obama is a Marxist, Obama didn't legitimately get his degrees from Columbia and Harvard, Obama didn't have anything more to do with our taking out Osama bin Laden than George W. Bush did, simply removes any credibility whatsoever from the person making those absurd claims, and anyone serious will dismiss your argument out of hand, and rightfully conclude that you cannot be considered even as a reasonable person with whom to have a dialog on the issues.

[QUOTE=Jackson; 427270]I guess we'll never really know exactly how academically accomplished Obama really is because...

1. Occidental College records. SEALED.
2. Columbia college records. SEALED.
3. Columbia thesis paper. SEALED.
4. Harvard college records. SEALED.
5. Selective Service registration. SEALED.
6. Medical records. SEALED.
7. Illinois state senate schedule. SEALED.
8. Illinois state senate records. SEALED.
9. Law practice client list. SEALED.
10. Certified copy of original birth certificate. SEALED.
11. Signed, embossed paper certification of live birth. SEALED.
12. Baptism record. SEALED[/QUOTE]After Romney's great acting performance, don't you have any better arguments against Obama than reviving conspiracy theories about his past?

[QUOTE]...and why is it that we've never heard from anybody who remembers Obama from his college days?[/QUOTE]They are out there, despite what Fox News may have reported. Here's one, google Carol Platt Liebau, she's a political analyst and commentator, who was at Harvard at the same time.

[QUOTE=El Alamo;427284]. I made my money off the stupidity of others. And in this world there is nobody as stupid as an Obama supporter. It takes an unique and total lack of intelligence to fall for a transpàrent fraude, fake and huckster such as Obama.[/QUOTE]Or is it a trade secret? I could use some extra income. As you know, life is a painful and longsuffering journey. Even just crossing the road is difficult and dangerous, never mind about Wall Street.

Let me guess, you are a bookie.

[QUOTE=Black Shirt; 427298]Or is it a trade secret? I could use some extra income. As you know, life is a painful and longsuffering journey. Even just crossing the road is difficult and dangerous, never mind about Wall Street.

Let me guess, you are a bookie.[/QUOTE]Well, Black Shirt, as you know, investing is more or less blind luck. However, it helps to have enough intelligence to stay away from investments such as electric forks, Solyndra etc..

The litmus test for the minimum intelligence needed to avoid investing in electric forks and Solyndra is whether or not you can detect BS when you see and hear BS. The simplest test for this is to ask yourself: Does Obama look and sound like a fake, fraud and huckster? If your answer is yes, you have the minimal intelligence for successful investing. If your answer is no, you will probably lose all your money investing in electric forks and Solyndra.

As you can see, Obama is not only a fake, fraud and huckster. Obama believes his own BS. He invested our money in solyndra and left us with the tab. Time to cut in two the credit card we gave Obama and return Obama to his true calling : Dealing drugs

Sorry for being a little behind the curve on responding to the GM / Chrysler 'Obama-ruptcy' filings but perhaps you should look up from all the Liberal B / S and see reality.

1. Neither GM nor Chrysler truly entered bankruptcy but instead received 'Obama-ruptcy' which violated the Chapter 13 Federal Bankruptcy statute. At no time did either company contemplate filing Chapter 7 for liquidation of the companies.

2. Obama was not about to permit either GM or Chrysler to enter into the normal Chapter 13 Bankruptcy process. Why? Should those companies have enter into Chapter 13 proceedings their LABOR CONTRACTS would most likely have been voided by the court and Obama could not permit his most ardent supports, unions and the UAW in specific, to have to renegotiate their wage and benefit packages.

3. What Obama-ruptcy did was to strip equity ownership from the legal owners and transfer a portion of it to the UAW while keeping their wage and benefit packages safe from total renegotiation.

There is no proof what so ever the Stimulus passed by Obama and the Democrats 'rescued' the economy from a second 'Great Depression' as Democrats would have us believe. The Stimulus was so effective our workforce participation rate is the lowest in over 30 years; more people are on welfare and food stamps than 4 years ago. Then magically somehow our unemployment rate falls while the economy, three years after the Official End of the Recession, chugs along at an enigmatic 1. 9% growth in GDP which is not enough to produce sufficient jobs for those entering the job market for the first time.

Even liberal economists are questioning the new 7. 8% unemployment rate when fewer jobs were produced in September than August, and fewer jobs in August than July, and the rate goes DOWN. Could there really be 800, 000 people who suddenly started their own home / self-employed businesses in September – more than all the jobs produced the entire year and right after the debacle of the debates?

There is one thing I have noticed, for the last several months' government agencies have been trumpeting economic activity figures then a few weeks later very quietly revise them downward, in some cases significantly.

And for the closing shot at our liberal friends;

I heard Obama's prepared weekly address and he sounded strong and confident, like the Obama of old. But of course he had his old friend T0TUS with him. You know Teleprompter Of The United States.

While I am sure he will study harder for the next debate and not find it such a 'drag' as he did before, his words not mine. He will still be only half a man without his beloved TOTUS at his side, having to face someone who does not drink the Kool Aid, hits hard and keeps coming back to uncomfortable realities instead of the drooling true believers from his rallies.

Have you noticed his rallies are getting smaller and smaller?

You are Wrong.

American Car Industries are on Top.

Romney said to file bankruptcy.

He is two Faced full of Lies.

He can not remember day to day what he said.

Too Bad.

[url]http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_10_signs_of_alzheimers.asp[/url]

GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to follow normal Chapter 13 REORGANIZATION and not 'Obama-ruptcy'. No other company has been given such a pass, but I guess if you are in the Prez's corner Federal Law does not apply to you, I. E. Dept of Justice and Dept of Homeland Security.

Well WT69, I see you have reverted to the same tactic as your idol, Obama. When you can not win the argument on merit U-turn to name calling and personal attacks. After having his ass handed to him on October 3rd it's all Obama has left, name calling and personal attacks. What happened to HOPE & CHANGE?

WILD WALLEYE: I ask for a blonde.

ROMNEY: I was a blonde yesterday. If it helps, I'm still a blonde downstairs.

JACKSON: What do you mean you don't do BBJs?

ROMNEY: It hurts, I have some cold sores at the moment.

WT69: What do you mean you don't take foodstamps!

ROMNEY: Is that a real or fake Rolex. No matter, I'll take it.

TOYMANN: Jeepers! Who do you take me for, you trash! My dick is too good for you.

ROMNEY: I only ask you to pay up front, sir. You don't have to be President Menem. And your hair is too oily.

ESTEN: Hey, I am not stupid, that is not the body I saw in the picture.

ROMNEY: Not to worry, I can make you a happy man! Just close your eyes.

Enough of possible scenerios! That was Romney in the debate. So many switches, so many possibles. It was enough to make Obama speechless. I hope Michelle give him a few slaps!

"The aircraft was large, modern and considered among the world's safest. But that night it was flying straight into a huge thunderstorm. Turbulence was extreme, and airspeed indicators may not have been functioning properly. Worse, the pilots were incompetent. As the plane threatened to stall they panicked by pointing the nose up, losing speed when they ought to have done the opposite. It was all over in minutes.

Was this the fate of Flight 447, the Air France jet that plunged mysteriously into the Atlantic a couple of years ago? Could be. What I'm talking about here is the Obama presidency."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904140604576495932704234052.html

[QUOTE=Jackson; 427270]I guess we'll never really know exactly how academically accomplished Obama really is because.

12. Baptism record. SEALED.

Jackson[/QUOTE]I didn't realize Muslims practiced baptism, too*

*Keep it in your pants, I am making a joke.

[QUOTE=Member #2041;427285]That was English, although I might concede that it was English beyond your level of comprehension. Sorry, I can't do much about that.[/quote][quote=]Nobody who has ever not been qualified has become the President of the Harvard Law Review.[/quote]I'll concede that the words appear to be English. I guess you have to go to a special program to learn to write like that and to employ the double negative so deftly.

[quote=]As I said, I acknowledge that Obama likely got into Columbia via affirmative action. But he then did earn academic honors at Columbia. Even rich white folks who earn academic honors at Columbia can likely get into Harvard Law on that credential. That being said, unless they are damn accomplished in their studies once they get there, they don't become President of Harvard Law Review.[/quote]When you get a chance, maybe you could post the details of the HLR's process for selection of its president. Oh wait, it's a subjective process. Therefore, anyone can be selected, for this role at an institution that has nearly broken its back bending over backwards to show that how racially aware and sympathetic they are. Of course they would never advance someone based upon anything other than merit even if by doing so they would have additional proof of their "greatness." I mean, did any of the other prestigious law schools have someone claiming to be from Africa as president of their reviews?

[quote=]Getting into Harvard's MBA program is roughly 2-3 orders of magnitude lesser of an exclusive accomplishment than getting appointed President of Harvard Law Review.[/quote]Excellent point. Are you also aware of the fact that red and green are different colors?

[quote=]Even for someone who probably earned it like Mitt Romney (as opposed to legacy entrees like Dubya).[/quote]W was a legacy at Yale, not HBS.

[quote=]I personally got into Harvard's MBA program,[/quote]Congrats, I just can't understand why someone would bother applying to a business school that doesn't excel at finance. It just seems counter intuitive. I already knew how to party and socialize so, I was looking for a little more substance than HBS could offer.

[quote=]without a rich legacy entree that G. W. Bush had, although I personally chose to attend a more quantitatively rigorous program, one in which I doubt that Dubya could have handled the higher level math.[/QUOTE]I can think of three, MIT (too technical and linear, stifles creativity) , Wharton and the place I attended. I suspect that any of those institutions would have welcomed GWB. His grades were 'good enough' and his pedigree was something most institutions would have difficulty passing up (they are all wh*res, too).

[QUOTE=Member #2041;427288]The fact is, Columbia University lists Obama as having graduated with academic honors.[/quote]Then you should have no problem posting a link to that statement.

[quote=]I never heard Obama claim anything of the kind with respect to Harvard,[/quote]You've been making them ad nauseum (that means more than frequently). You are pointing to his brilliance being the driving factor behind his selection as HLR's president.

[quote=]but the Law Review officers are chosen by a combination of their academic standing and a vote of their peers in their class.[/quote]There you go again. I find it remarkable that there isn't a contingency of Obama's HLS classmate telling everyone how great he is.

[quote=]One needs to be academically accomplished amongst their peers within Harvard Law School, as well as have superior interpersonal skills to be selected as the President of the Law Review.[/QUOTE]He's a real people person, alright. He is devoid of interpersonal skills.

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_Chapter_11_reorganization[/url]

[QUOTE=Doppelganger; 427400]GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to follow normal Chapter 13 REORGANIZATION and not 'Obama-ruptcy'. No other company has been given such a pass, but I guess if you are in the Prez's corner Federal Law does not apply to you, I. E. Dept of Justice and Dept of Homeland Security.

Well WT69, I see you have reverted to the same tactic as your idol, Obama. When you can not win the argument on merit U-turn to name calling and personal attacks. After having his ass handed to him on October 3rd it's all Obama has left, name calling and personal attacks. What happened to HOPE & CHANGE?[/QUOTE]