I guess this fits here, since it is Trumps favorite phrase.
O'Reilly and Fox.
Printable View
I guess this fits here, since it is Trumps favorite phrase.
O'Reilly and Fox.
Give it a rest WT69. Maybe you need to join the other snowflakes in a group support hug. So what if he kicks ass and does not bother with taking names. While the liberals are teaching their kids to be kind and accepting of other religions and life styles the muslin radicals are teaching their kids how to kill your kids.
While you complaining about the bully stuff how about explaining the fascists on left shutting down free speech on campus?
Go back and look at history - Stalin, Mussolini, Mao - stilling free speech just like our current little group of left wing brown shirts.
Are you talking about UC Berkeley?
They want another day, May 2nd, so it does not interfere with classes in session.
[url]http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Ann-Coulter-s-appearance-at-Berkeley-isn-t-11098597.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result[/url]
The dumb Blond wants to talk about Alternate Facts. It will just be Her the 3 other Republicans on campus.
[QUOTE=Doppelganger;448934]Give it a rest WT69. Maybe you need to join the other snowflakes in a group support hug. So what if he kicks ass and does not bother with taking names. While the liberals are teaching their kids to be kind and accepting of other religions and life styles the muslin radicals are teaching their kids how to kill your kids.
While you complaining about the bully stuff how about explaining the fascists on left shutting down free speech on campus?
Go back and look at history - Stalin, Mussolini, Mao - stilling free speech just like our current little group of left wing brown shirts.[/QUOTE]
WT69 come on guy you know it's not just Berkeley. Also it was not a schedule change it was the threat of bodily injury. I guess you missed all the video of the $100,000 in damage from the last "demonstration".
So being a republican and a dumb blond cancels her 1st amendment rights? What's you shirt, pants and shoe size? I'll be sending your Brown Shirt uniform via Federal Express ASAP.
When Warren and Sanders say they are embarrassed by these folks actions and Coulter should be allowed to speak you know your on the wrong side of this.
She has some Smarts.
She Cancelled.
[URL]http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Ann-Coulter-backing-out-of-UC-Berkeley-speech-11100585.php[/URL]
I don't care if she speaks, I just don't like the Violence, like when that alt-right personality Milo Yiannopoulos wanted to speak.
In the past, I was there to protest the Vietnam War.
There was no violence at that time.
Just "4 Dead In Ohio.".
[QUOTE=Doppelganger;448948]WT69 come on guy you know it's not just Berkeley. Also it was not a schedule change it was the threat of bodily injury. I guess you missed all the video of the $100,000 in damage from the last "demonstration".
So being a republican and a dumb blond cancels her 1st amendment rights? What's you shirt, pants and shoe size? I'll be sending your Brown Shirt uniform via Federal Express ASAP.
When Warren and Sanders say they are embarrassed by these folks actions and Coulter should be allowed to speak you know your on the wrong side of this.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69;448949]She has some Smarts.
She Cancelled.
[URL]http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Ann-Coulter-backing-out-of-UC-Berkeley-speech-11100585.php[/URL]
I don't care if she speaks, I just don't like the Violence, like when that alt-right personality Milo Yiannopoulos wanted to speak.
In the past, I was there to protest the Vietnam War.
There was no violence at that time.
Just "4 Dead In Ohio.".[/QUOTE]Lets start with Milo, he did not cause the damage and mayhem which occurred - that was the liberal brown shirts who attacked the venue.
The Vietnam protests were anything but peaceful, Does the weather underground, Bill Aires ect. Ring a bell.
Kent State, where a bunch of college idiots charged a group of National Guardsmen armed with rifles & fixed bayonets, separated a small group of Guardsmen, surrounded them on a hill and threatened them to the point they were in fear of their lives. They should have shot more of the idiots. Go back and look at the news reels - the students were in no way "peaceful".
I'm sure you would have sided with England and locked up Ben Franklin, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton - as their speaking freely caused problems.
In Oakland and Berkeley there are a group of Anarchists. They are not the students of U.C.
They are the ones who starts most of the riots whenever some group wants to make a speech or protest.
It has nothing to do with what you call Brown Shirts.
Most of the violence was done during and after Vietnam was by The Weather Underground, not from California. Yes, there was the Black Panther Party in Oakland, but that was mostly Racial protests.
[URL]http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Weather_Underground[/URL]#Background.
I have lots photos of the peaceful San Francisco March in 1967.
[url]http://hrmediaarchive.estuarypress.com/san-francisco-march-against-the-war-in-vietnam/[/url]
[QUOTE=Doppelganger;448956]Lets start with Milo, he did not cause the damage and mayhem which occurred - that was the liberal brown shirts who attacked the venue.
The Vietnam protests were anything but peaceful, Does the weather underground, Bill Aires etc. Ring a bell.
Kent State, where a bunch of college idiots charged a group of National Guardsmen armed with rifles & fixed bayonets, separated a small group of Guardsmen, surrounded them on a hill and threatened them to the point they were in fear of their lives. They should have shot more of the idiots. Go back and look at the news reels - the students were in no way "peaceful".
I'm sure you would have sided with England and locked up Ben Franklin, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton - as their speaking freely caused problems.[/QUOTE]
It makes Your posts sound More erudite when You randomly Capitalize about every Third word.
Or not.
The Pres. Trump report card after 100 days.
1. Tried to block Muslims from coming into the US from certain countries. That idea was blocked by the courts.
2. Promised the faithful that the Affordable Care Act would be repealed by now. That idea hasn't worked out, even with his own Republicans.
3. Promised to build a wall on the US-Mexican border AND Mexico would pay for it. I guess that idea hasn't worked out since he's asking for the money from Congress.
4. Wants to punish 'Sanctuary Cities' for stopping the local police dept. From deporting illegals, by withholding fed. Money from the cities. The courts have stopped that idea.
5. Has repealed all the environmental standards implemented during the Obama years. And gutted the Environmental Protection Dept. By cutting its. Budget.
6. Got us into a very tense situation with North Korea. And has managed to piss off China, Russia, Iran, Syria and a few other countries.
[QUOTE=BayBoy;448963]The Pres. Trump report card after 100 days.
1. Tried to block Muslims from coming into the US from certain countries. That idea was blocked by the courts.
2. Promised the faithful that the Affordable Care Act would be repealed by now. That idea hasn't worked out, even with his own Republicans.
3. Promised to build a wall on the US-Mexican border AND Mexico would pay for it. I guess that idea hasn't worked out since he's asking for the money from Congress.
4. Wants to punish 'Sanctuary Cities' for stopping the local police dept. From deporting illegals, by withholding fed. Money from the cities. The courts have stopped that idea.
5. Has repealed all the environmental standards implemented during the Obama years. And gutted the Environmental Protection Dept. By cutting its. Budget.
6. Got us into a very tense situation with North Korea. And has managed to piss off China, Russia, Iran, Syria and a few other countries.[/QUOTE] Sounds like Trump is living rent-free in your head and you can't get him out.
You will not here it on FOX.
He compares himself with Andrew Jackson.
He said that Andrew Jackson could have put a stop to the Civil War.
He said that Jackson did not like the way the War was going.
The problem is that he died 16 years before the War.
And he also owned over 200 slaves.
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69;448967]You will not here it on FOX.
He compares himself with Andrew Jackson.
He said that Andrew Jackson could have put a stop to the Civil War.
He said that Jackson did not like the way the War was going.
The problem is that he died 16 years before the War.
And he also owned over 200 slaves.[/QUOTE]Besides the fake Carla and Pia photos, we get fake news from worldtravel69. This is what Trump actually said regarding his opinion that Andrew Jackson could have prevented the U.S. Civil War: "I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little later you wouldn't have had the Civil War.'' Continuing, Trump said: "He was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War." Trump's reference was correct as Andrew Jackson was really angry about the Nullification Crisis which occurred during his lifetime and which was a seminal event of the ensuing Civil War; the seeds of which were sown long before April 12th, 1861.
Or Is that what Fox said?
"This is what he said President Trump made a puzzling claim about Andrew Jackson and the Civil War in an interview.
Speaking to the Washington Examiner, Trump wondered why issues that triggered the war could not have been worked out in order to prevent the bloody conflict. Trump praised the accomplishments of Jackson, the populist president he has cited as a role model.
He made the puzzling claim that Jackson [B]was really angry that he saw what was happening in regard to the Civil War.[/B] But Jackson died in 1845, and the Civil War didn't begin until 16 years later, in 1861.
Trump then said, People don't ask the question, but why was there the Civil War?.
I wonder why? I guess he skipped history in class.
[QUOTE=Xanadu;448968]Besides the fake Carla and Pia photos, we get fake news from worldtravel69. This is what Trump actually said regarding his opinion that Andrew Jackson could have prevented the U.S. Civil War: "I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little later you wouldn't have had the Civil War.'' Continuing, Trump said: "He was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War." Trump's reference was correct as Andrew Jackson was really angry about the Nullification Crisis which occurred during his lifetime and which was a seminal event of the ensuing Civil War; the seeds of which were sown long before April 12th, 1861.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69;448969]Or Is that what Fox said?
"This is what he said President Trump made a puzzling claim about Andrew Jackson and the Civil War in an interview.
Speaking to the Washington Examiner, Trump wondered why issues that triggered the war could not have been worked out in order to prevent the bloody conflict. Trump praised the accomplishments of Jackson, the populist president he has cited as a role model.
He made the puzzling claim that Jackson [B]was really angry that he saw what was happening in regard to the Civil War.[/B] But Jackson died in 1845, and the Civil War didn't begin until 16 years later, in 1861.
Trump then said, People don't ask the question, but why was there the Civil War?.
I wonder why? I guess he skipped history in class.[/QUOTE]Again, Trump correctly referred to the Ordinance of Nullification. Again, the seeds of the Civil War were sown over a rather extended period of time before the watershed event of April 12th 1861 at Fort Sumter, SC.
It's really not that difficult. Maybe you skipped history class. After skipping reading comprehension class. Again, fake news on your part.
Huh. I read the transcript and Trump did not mention the Ordinance of Nullification at all.