Lady Gaga wants repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell
[url]http://www.politico.com/click/stories/1011/lady_gaga_tells_senators_end_dadt.html[/url]
I hope it gets repealed.
Re: Lady Gaga wants repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell
[QUOTE=House Music; 414228]
Lady Gaga wants repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. [/QUOTE]Funny thing is, PFC Bradley Manning (the gay source for the wikileaks document dump) used a music CDRW of Lady Gaga to store the stolen documents. He sang along to her song "Telephone" while he downloaded the files.
Synchronicity!
Too much news, not enough Paraguayan Pussy! I have to buy a ticket.
Deficit Reduction Commission
The vote on the Deficit Reduction Commission's proposal is tomorrow. It stands no chance of getting the 14 votes necessary to force a Congressional vote. Five panel members already have come out against it. But, it will get over 50% support, which is significant.
As I predicted, the gnashing of teeth has come from the left, and Republicans are the ones who are endorsing the plan. The two House Republicans who aren't, Paul Ryan and Dave Camp, are refusing to vote for it for completely foolish reasons. Ryan's sole objection is that it doesn't do enough to pare back health care costs and, in particular, it doesn't gut Obamacare. That's his only objection. He likes the rest of it, or at least he's said that the Obamacare issue is the only thing that's preventing him from voting for it. Fair enough. But, the solution is not to withhold support. Vote for it, and at the same time make clear that it doesn't go far enough, so you're going to be introducing legislation to gut Obamacare. There's still plenty of support for that, and it won't wane just because this plan passes.
Ryan and Camp are letting a golden opportunity slip through their fingers. They both say that they are going to use this plan as the starting point for their own deficit reduction measures. But, regardless of how optimistic anyone may be about the impact that the "new" House and Tea Partiers will have, there will never be as good an opportunity as this to cut the deficit.
The proposal pushes all the right buttons:
- Social security and medicare are cut, and the retirement age is increased in the distant future.
- Federal wages are frozen and the federal workforce gets trimmed by 200, 000.
-The money-pit post office gets scaled back.
- Individual retirement plans are scaled back, simplified, and some of the silly caps are raised.
- Corporate taxes are rolled back and brought in line with the rest of the world.
- Individual rates are lowered, and the individual tax base is broadened, in exchange for sacrificing a variety of sacred cow deductions.
It's a good proposal. They ought to vote for it. Are there other things that could be added to it? Sure. So what. Republicans have two years in control of the House and plenty of time on their hands to come up with additional cuts and proposals. Unfortunately, rather than taking the bird in the hand, they're going to try for two in the Bush, and they'll end up with nothing. In two years, we'll hear Obama campaigning on the deficit reduction measures he tried to put in place, and that Republicans killed it. He won't mention that more Democrats will have voted against it, and the press won't call him on it (surprise) and Republicans will have pissed away a great opportunity.
Ricardo Rule. 5 VARIOUS REVIEWS reviews have now been posted.
(read below)
[quote=jackson; 413220][blue]Moveon,
I believe that you are a professional political operative and I'm calling you out.
Therefor, having made this finding, I am invoking the "Ricardo Rule": [b]your next five posts must be detailed descriptions of your encounters with working girls here in Buenos Aires. [/b]
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue][/quote]
Thanks Stan you are right
[QUOTE=Stan the Man; 414340]Curbarn:
Please spend some time reading the board. There are plenty of other threads where folks, including myself, can and do post about many of the things you're interested in.
If you really want to talk about gay rights and transvestites, you are free to start your own thread. I doubt you'll get too much traction, but I've been wrong before.
The solution if you don't want to read about US politics is: Don't read this thread. It's pretty simple.
Good luck on the golf trip. [/QUOTE]But I need a better caddy. Last night I was driunk. And am sick of defending the government of the country from whence I came. To see thread dedicated to opinion on government mismanagement etc p*the me off. Do I care about gay rights not at all, it was just a BillMaherism. I will try to be more open minded.
As for punter 127 yeah I moved to Brunei in 1987, divorced and moved to Thailand in 1991. Do I post in asia anywhere, gee do you really need a forum for Thailand, everything is right in front of you. But yes I think I posted to Pattaya addicts 3 or 4 years ago. I see you have a lot of time to check up on me, so there it is. I will forward my interpol profile should you need it.
You now have two meaningless and/or off topic post.
[QUOTE=Curbarn;414349]As for punter 127 yeah I moved to Brunei in 1987, divorced and moved to Thailand in 1991. Do I post in asia anywhere, gee do you really need a forum for Thailand, everything is right in front of you. But yes I think I posted to Pattaya addicts 3 or 4 years ago. I see you have a lot of time to check up on me, so there it is. I will forward my interpol profile should you need it.[/QUOTE]Sure I use the Thailand forum, because some of us look a little farther then [i] 'right in front of you', [/i] And I want the latest and most up to date information possible. Apparently I'm not the only one considering the Thailand forum is huge with about 40 threads.
I'm always happy to see new members but how about giving something useful back to the forum. If I remember correctly Jackson started this political thread and it's his forum, so who are you to criticize it on your very first post? Very Rude Dude.
Now we need get back on topic so here goes; [b] Obama Sucks, Sara Palin supports tea bagging liberals, and Fox News is best news channel ever. [/b]. LOL