[QUOTE=Jackson] In case you haven't heard, we're winning![/QUOTE]Yeah, we kept saying that in Vietnam, too.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Jackson] In case you haven't heard, we're winning![/QUOTE]Yeah, we kept saying that in Vietnam, too.
Jackson and Wild W.
I commend you for attempting to calm the uncontrolled LIBERALS in the crowd but your comments are falling on deaf ears. In the past several years I cannot remember such crazy points of view being expressed, on any thread that didn't revolve around Exon. I know you feel left out Ex. It can't always be about you. LOL. Keep holding up the republican perspective brothers. If not for you two, Iraq pre-liberation, would be painted by these clowns as some sort of luxury retirement community run by a benelovent dictator whose primary concern was the well-being of his people. Lets not forget that for two years prior to the Iraq invasion Sadam refused to allow any NATO inspection teams into the country and pretty much snubbed his nose at the international community in spite of previously agreeing to allow inspection teams into the country as agreed after Bush part 1 military action.
The fact that the outcome of Bush part 2 (Iraq liberation is an exellent description) is going quite well, is currently illustrated by the fact that the "Iraq War" performance year-to-date is virtually off the radar in our current presidential election. Funny how wild-ass liberals always prefer to be oblivious to the facts when they don't fit their UNENDING LIBERAL AGENDA!
Keep the faith fellas and Ex "you are and will always be a fine fisherman". Happy Mongering All. Toymann
Hey Bank Note.
ENOUGH SAID.
IALOTFLMAO. I Am Lying On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off.
You just cannot be taken seroiusly characterizing Sadam as an Emperor.
Happy Mongering. Toymann.
PS. Love your last post BAD. LOL.
Ok guys,
I've had quite enough.
Time to break it up.
[QUOTE=BadMan]Ok guys,
I've had quite enough.
Time to break it up[/QUOTE]Ok I posted pics of this girl before but here is more.
More boobs less W Bush.
Cheers!
[QUOTE=Bank Note]I hope it happens & you live to see the liberation.[/QUOTE]Bank Note,
For the record, I would never wish for you, your family or any other person to be subjugated for years by a homicidal maniac like Saddam Hussein.
Thanks,
Jackson
=========================================
"[I]It must be nice being an appeaser. You get to muddle along with your head in the sand while other good people, in the process of keeping the world safe for themselves, will inadvertently keep it safe for you too.[/i]"
[QUOTE=Jackson]Bank Note,
For the record, I would never wish for you, your family or any other person to be subjugated for years by a homicidal maniac like Saddam Hussein.
Thanks,
Jackson[/QUOTE]Good point Jackson! It is much better to be bombed or raped by US soldiers. Go USA!
[QUOTE=Gato Hunter]Ok I posted pics of this girl before but here is more.
More boobs less W Bush.
Cheers![/QUOTE]Any details?
[QUOTE=Wild Walleye]Any details?[/QUOTE]Yes,
I was out with Rock Harders and we stepped into Cutty Sark one night not long ago. That's where she works!
Exon
"To think our forefathers fought and died for the right for our nation to be a Christian nation."
I guess this gentleman has never heard of the disestablishment clause of the Constitution, stating there shall be no official religion. I further find the comment about the book of Revelations interesting since Islam only dates to I believe it is the 6th century at the very earliest; that's when Muhammad was born.
But again, let's not let facts get in the way of bullshit.
[QUOTE=Dickhead]"To think our forefathers fought and died for the right for our nation to be a Christian nation."
I guess this gentleman has never heard of the disestablishment clause of the Constitution, stating there shall be no official religion. I further find the comment about the book of Revelatins interesting since Islam only dates to I believe it is the 6th century at the very earlies; that's when Muhammad was born.
But again, let's not let facts get in the way of bullshit.[/QUOTE]We all know that, while old, Dickhead was not a Founding Father so can't really understand their state of mind regarding Christian values.
However George Washington and John Adams were both founding fathers that had cause to sign the 1796 treaty with Tripoli containing the following article.
"Article 11.
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen, — and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
Maybe they had their fingers crossed while they signed it. Come to think about it maybe they had their fingers crossed when they penned the whole idea of there not being a state religion which I would assume to encompass not having a state theology as well.
Now Thomas Pain, not a signer of the Declaration of course, but considered by some to be the Father of the Revolution itself was openly not Christian but a Deist (kind of like an agnostic today) Washington (father of the country) Jefferson (who wrote that pesky Constitution thingy) Wythe, Benjamin Franklin (who incidently would have fucking LOVED this site, he was a huge putenyero) were all Deists.
Can't let the facts interfere with convenient beliefs though.
Obama as the Antichrist, man they must be scared they will lose. The last election it was "Vote for Kerry and you're voting to get attacked by terrorists", apparently this election if you vote for Obama you're voting for Satan. Theologically speaking though, shouldn't it therefore be the duty of all believers (funny how the Jihadists use the same term) to them vote for the Antichrist thereby hastening the end times and the return of Christ?
Kinda funny evoking "Christian Values" on a board devoted to banging hookers. That could be a Jon Stewart "moment of Zen."
Mongers,
The ultra conservative right wing midwestern / southern Jesus Freaks who write that kind of verbal vomit are just as ignorant and equally as dangerous as all the Islamic extremists and Al Qaeda members rolled into one. They are the same people that elected Shrub twice and apparently are ready to elect Shrub Lite this November. The "founding fathers" created the electoral college to protect the United States from these redneck, ignorant religious psychopaths and unfortunately the NASCAR states seem to have more electoral votes these days than the secular states. Scary times we live in.
Suerte,
Rock Harders
The electoral college was necessary back in the horse and buggy days simply to get the election results in a timely fashion. It's now an anachronism but of course it'd require a constitutional amendment to change the system and that will never happen since the less populous states are not going to vote to dilute their disproportionate power.
[b]One person, one vote[/b], and that doesn't happen under the present system. Good thing I don't give a shit what happens up there any more because it's really not a pretty sight.
Now I'm gonna found out who this Tisdale fuck is. Now Waymon Tisdale, he could play some ball.
[url]http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=862161[/url]
Appears to be the source of the garbage Sid recently posted, and this Tisdale appears to be a run of the mill doctor from Maryland, a hematologist. He's entitled to his opinion and I will defend to the death, preferably his, his right to say what he said.
[QUOTE=Dickhead][url]http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=862161[/url][/QUOTE]Holy shit. The people on that forum are fucking nutters.
Regards,
BM
Here is proof that Palin is the devil.
[url]http://bumperstickers.cafepress.com/item/mccainsatan-08-3-lapel-sticker-48-pk/275088711[/url]
It has to be true otherwise it couldn't be posted right?
[QUOTE=Rock Harders]Mongers,
The ultra conservative right wing midwestern / southern Jesus Freaks who write that kind of verbal vomit are just as ignorant and equally as dangerous as all the Islamic extremists and Al Qaeda members rolled into one. They are the same people that elected Shrub twice and apparently are ready to elect Shrub Lite this November. The "founding fathers" created the electoral college to protect the United States from these redneck, ignorant religious psychopaths and unfortunately the NASCAR states seem to have more electoral votes these days than the secular states. Scary times we live in.
Suerte,
Rock Harders[/QUOTE]Wow, words of wisdom from our own supreme elitist, (Heil Rock Harders) However he seems to have a defeatist "cut n run" attitude.
The only sound worse than a grown man crying is the sound of a fat lady farting. (But in this case the after effect is about the same!)
You know Punter,
The absolute last thing I want to get into here is a personal pissing contest with you or anybody else. This is not personal, it is merely political debate. However, if you mean in your assertions that I am an elitest, in that I only want the elite running the USA, your are correct. I only want the elite intellectuals, who attended the elite educational institutions, attained elite status at said institutions, and hold elite advanced degrees from additional elite institutions to be in charge of the most powerful and influencial nation-state currently in existence. I do not want Billy Ray who graduated from East Nascar State University running the country, nor a former exterminator, nor some guy who only got to where he is at by the fortunate circumstances of his birth. I also do not want some guy who looks to "god" or "jesus" for guidance in making serious decisions regarding policy; I want someone with an IQ of 160 or better using his elite education in International Relations or Economics to decide the best course of action.
The USA is in serious trouble, and it needs an elite intellectual at its helm, not some rich guy's son who has excelled at mediocrity his entire life and only ended up in politics because he failed at everything else.
Suerte,
Rock Harders
[QUOTE=Rock Harders] I do not want Billy Ray who graduated from East Nascar State University running the country, nor a former exterminator, nor some guy who only got to where he is at by the fortunate circumstances of his birth.
Rock Harders[/QUOTE]I heard that if Annie Oakley had not accepted the VP offer that it was going to be offered to Dale Earnhart Jr. And, that initially McCain wanted to put Dale Earnhart on the ticket even though he's dead. You know, in honor of him and all.
[QUOTE=Rock Harders]You know Punter-
The absolute last thing I want to get into here is a personal pissing contest with you or anybody else. This is not personal, it is merely political debate. However, if you mean in your assertions that I am an elitest, in that I only want the elite running the USA, your are correct. I only want the elite intellectuals, who attended the elite educational institutions, attained elite status at said institutions, and hold elite advanced degrees from additional elite institutions to be in charge of the most powerful and influencial nation-state currently in existence. I do not want Billy Ray who graduated from East Nascar State University running the country, nor a former exterminator, nor some guy who only got to where he is at by the fortunate circumstances of his birth. I also do not want some guy who looks to "god" or "jesus" for guidance in making serious decisions regarding policy; I want someone with an IQ of 160 or better using his elite education in International Relations or Economics to decide the best course of action.
The USA is in serious trouble, and it needs an elite intellectual at its helm, not some rich guy's son who has excelled at mediocrity his entire life and only ended up in politics because he failed at everything else.
Suerte,
Rock Harders[/QUOTE]This is what I mean when I refer to you as an elitist;
[quote]e •lit •ism or é•lit •ism (ĭ-l ē't ĭz'əm, ā-l ē'-)
N.
1. The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
2. The sense of entitlement enjoyed by such a group or class.
Control, rule, or domination by such a group or class.
Elitist e •lit'ist adj. & n.[/QUOTE]You and your leftwing buddies continue to insult the very people you seek support from. That seems to be working very well, keep it up!
Do you really think that the American people are going to buy into the thinking that somehow YOU (and OBAMA) know what ’s best for the rest of us?
FYI many highly intelligent and educated people look to God for guidance. It ’s a shame you didn ’t include tolerance in your vast studies, personally I find your views and your narrow minded thinking unbelievably sad and pathetic!
But when the why are couple with comon sense, they I have something powerful to offer: a brilliant practical leader. I assume this is what Rock meant. Obama has the qualifications to demonstarate brilliance and comon sense. On the other hand, McCain was at the bottom of his class at university, yet was an effective legislator, until he started making his deals to become president over the last 5 years. You can couple intelligence and comon sense without high grades.
Just my 2 cents
[QUOTE=Doggboy]I heard that if Annie Oakley had not accepted the VP offer that it was going to be offered to Dale Earnhart Jr. And, that initially McCain wanted to put Dale Earnhart on the ticket even though he's dead. You know, in honor of him and all.[/QUOTE]Face it guys. John McCain's selection of Palin as VP was the best political "head fake" in decades.
McCain had Obama and everybody else assuming that he was going to select Romney, luring Obama into selecting Biden as the best matchup against Romney.
McCain then selects Palin, and in a single stroke energizes his conservative base while simultaneously appealing to the defected Hillary voters.
Experience counts!
And you guys think Obama is ready for Putin?
Thanks,
Jackson
[QUOTE=Jackson]Face it guys. John McCain's selection of Palin as VP was the best political "head fake" in decades.
McCain had Obama and everybody else assuming that he was going to select Romney, luring Obama into selecting Biden as the best matchup against Romney.
McCain then selects Palin, and in a single stroke energizes his conservative base while simultaneously appealing to the defected Hillary voters.
Experience counts!
And you guys think Obama is ready for Putin?
Thanks,
Jackson[/QUOTE]Right you are that so far the choice of Annie has been a good "marketing" move. It may remain a good move in that regard, though alot can change between now and November. My concerns are many about this choice, but my sarcastic comments about the choice of Annie are more reflective of my concerns about pandering to the public. The common folk that Rock Harders refers to, often vote for candidates based on criteria that might be better used to "elect" a winner of "American Idol", rather than candidates who are more qualified to run the country.
I continue to hold the opinion that the USA should establish an impotent monarchy in addition to the current executive office. This way the public could elect people such as Annie to be "Queen for the Day" (or week or whatever) Maybe this would serve to slake much of the public's thirst for electing people who are more qualified to be some sort of media celebrity than they are to hold a position in a responsible, effective government.
Annie is sort of a combination of Julia Roberts in "Pretty Woman" and Princess Diana. A woman who appeals to those who get all gushy about somebody being elevated to a position completely at odds with their background and experience. Nice for movies and anachronistic monarchies, but silly bullshit in the real world. Or one would think.
Any previous Hillary supporter who now supports the McCain ticket because of Palin, should be taken out back of whatever fat farm they are attending, and beaten senseless with a heavily laminated copy of Roe vs. Wade.
How does McCain do it? Get Bush and Chaney to trash the markets, sink the Fannie and Franie, collapse a couple of century old investment houses then disappear. Now with Bush looking at water damage while the economy is going to hell in a hand basket, Chaney long gone, McCain can come on as the agent of change without being shackled to Bush. Are these guys clever or what? Somebody remind O'bama that he is running against McCain not Palin. Naw, they would have to redo all his scripts.
Anyone want to bet Biden steps aside so Hillary can run as the Dem VP?
[QUOTE=Doggboy]The common folk that Rock Harders refers to, often vote for candidates based on criteria that might be better used to "elect" a winner of "American Idol", rather than candidates who are more qualified to run the country.[/QUOTE]Dogg,
With all due respect, I was ROTFLMAO when I read this, given that it's largely because of the "elect a winner of American Idol" crowd that Obama is even a candidate.
Thanks,
Jackson
[QUOTE=Grshel1]How does McCain do it? Get Bush and Chaney to trash the markets, sink the Fannie and Franie, collapse a couple of century old investment houses then disappear. Now with Bush looking at water damage while the economy is going to hell in a hand basket, Chaney long gone, McCain can come on as the agent of change without being shackled to Bush. Are these guys clever or what? Somebody remind O'bama that he is running against McCain not Palin. Naw, they would have to redo all his scripts.[/QUOTE]Grshel1,
How exactly did McCain get "Bush and Chaney to trash the markets, sink the Fannie and Franie, collapse a couple of century old investment house"?
Did he use a pistol? Extortion? Bribery?
Thanks,
Jackson
[QUOTE=Doggboy]Any previous Hillary supporter who now supports the McCain ticket because of Palin, should be taken out back of whatever fat farm they are attending, and beaten senseless with a heavily laminated copy of Roe vs. Wade.[/QUOTE]Hey Dogg,
By your standard, no member of this website should vote for ether candidate, because none of the candidates support prostitution. In fact, I'm pretty confident that all of the candidates are anti-prostitution.
No voter can find a candidate (or person) who agrees with them on every issue.
Thanks,
Jackson
Well Jax I'm pretty sure all the candidates [b]say[/b] they are anti-prostitution but McCain was in the Navy in Asia so the chances he never fucked any prostitutes seem slim to me and if he didn't he should have.
[QUOTE=Jackson]Dogg,
With all due respect, I was ROTFLMAO when I read this, given that it's largely because of the "elect a winner of American Idol" crowd that Obama is even a candidate.
Thanks,
Jackson[/QUOTE]Jackson, you ignorant ****.:)
Better yet maybe the markets are deteriorating because banks got greedy and made bets they could not cover.
Or it may be the Three Trillion dollars we have sunk into Iraq.
I am going with a little of both.
[QUOTE=Gato Hunter]Better yet maybe the markets are deteriorating because banks got greedy and made bets they could not cover.
Or it may be the Three Trillion dollars we have sunk into Iraq.
I am going with a little of both.[/QUOTE]Hrm. I'll attribute the cause to government meddling in the housing market thanks to New Deal reforms.
As for the cost of the current war, as a percentage of GDP, the war is cheap compared to similar conflicts; somewhere between 1 and 2%.
[QUOTE=Darkme]Hrm. I'll attribute the cause to government meddling in the housing market thanks to New Deal reforms. [/QUOTE]Not to be vicious, but this might qualify as the most stupid statement ever posted on AP.
Dogg,
You are far too generous.
[QUOTE=Jackson]Originally Posted by Jackson.
Face it guys. John McCain's selection of Palin as VP was the best political "head fake" in decades.
McCain had Obama and everybody else assuming that he was going to select Romney, luring Obama into selecting Biden as the best matchup against Romney.
McCain then selects Palin, and in a single stroke energizes his conservative base while simultaneously appealing to the defected Hillary voters.
Experience counts!
And you guys think Obama is ready for Putin?[/QUOTE]Haha, yes great head fake. Seems he forgot to check he was plowing into a brick wall in the reverso. Oooh, and all those lies exposed in every major newspaper and the journalists, even Karl Rove of all people, throwing him under the bus. That's gotta hurt. And now he's just starting to run down the wall like a broken egg, so unseemly. McCain + Palin = McPain.
Experience counts, umm hmmm. Too bad Palin's is so tawdry when it's not outright vacuous. And McCain, so on the wrong side of the fence of regulating Wall Street when the jig is finally up on all the lousy business they wrote. And McCain asking "where do I get in line for one of those Reformer tee-shirts I saw Obama wearing". McPain, say again brothers, give me some of that McPain to run the country on.