"Killed with cars" since Sandy Hook.
When are we finally going to ban cars and stop this madness!
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69;431307][b]1100+[/b]
Killed with guns since Sandy Hook.[/QUOTE]
Printable View
"Killed with cars" since Sandy Hook.
When are we finally going to ban cars and stop this madness!
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69;431307][b]1100+[/b]
Killed with guns since Sandy Hook.[/QUOTE]
WT69 just where did you get a stat like that? Even Chicago which has some of the strictist gun laws on the books added only 5 in one day,but still what credible source is keeping it by the day nation wide.The authorative source I know is the FBI national stats and they are usually a year behind.
Say,did Obama come from Chicago? How could they being having such a hard time?
I will have to find the article I saw, but here is one to January 15.
[url]http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01/15/graphic-31-days-later-u-s-gun-deaths-since-newtown/[/url]
Here is another, still not the one I saw.
[url]http://www.fastcompany.com/3004943/latest-deadliest-gun-and-weaponry-innovations-brought-you-newtown-ct-trade-group[/url]
P.S.Yes Jackson that many people have been killed with cars,but how many were Murdered with Cars?
[QUOTE=Doppelganger; 431369]WT69 just where did you get a stat like that? Even Chicago which has some of the strictist gun laws on the books added only 5 in one day, but still what credible source is keeping it by the day nation wide. The authorative source I know is the FBI national stats and they are usually a year behind.
Say, did Obama come from Chicago? How could they being having such a hard time?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69; 431371]I will have to find the article I saw, but here is one to January 15.
[url]http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01/15/graphic-31-days-later-u-s-gun-deaths-since-newtown/[/url]
P. S. Yes Jackson that many people have been killed with cars, but how many were Murdered with Cars?[/QUOTE]I love my guns,but it would be better off to invent guns that will only operate with a fingerprint signature.
No match,no shot!
TL.
[QUOTE=Doppelganger; 431369]WT69 just where did you get a stat like that? Even Chicago which has some of the strictist gun laws on the books added only 5 in one day, but still what credible source is keeping it by the day nation wide. The authorative source I know is the FBI national stats and they are usually a year behind.
Say, did Obama come from Chicago? How could they being having such a hard time?[/QUOTE]Facts are not important to liberals, only emotions are important.
[QUOTE=Jackson;431375]Facts are not important to liberals, only emotions are important.[/QUOTE] Absolutely ' just a pure play on emotion', no concern for freedom. There's no intelligent arguments about the Second Amendment, no genuine concern about addressing the problem, just an agenda that focuses on infringing on the rights of peaceable citizens, not violent criminals.
[QUOTE=Sidney; 431308]The following are 37 statistics which show how four years of Obama have wrecked the USA economy.
1. During Obama's first term, the number of Americans on food stamps increased by an average of about 11, 000 per day.
2. At the beginning of the Obama era. 32 million Americans were on food stamps. Today, more than 47 million Americans are on food stamps.
4. The number of Americans receiving money directly from the federal government each month has grown from 94 million in the year 2000 tomore than 128 million today.
9. During Obama's first term, the number of Americans collecting federal disability insurance rose by more than 18 percent.
29. It is being projected that Obamacare will add 16 million more Americans to the Medicaid rolls.
30. The total amount of money that the federal government gives directly to the American people has grown by 32 percent since Barack Obama became president.[/QUOTE]You're not seeing this correctly.
To liberals, these are all "social justice" successes in that they represent methods by which Obama has wrestled money from the evil rich people and spread it out amongst the more deserving.
Thanks,
Jackson
You are talking about pennies.
Especially when they still have the Tax Loopholes.
How about France.
95% tax on the rich.
[QUOTE=Jackson; 431380]You're not seeing this correctly.
To liberals, these are all "social justice" successes in that they represent methods by which Obama has wrestled money from the evil rich people and spread it out amongst the more deserving.
Thanks,
Jackson[/QUOTE]
Yes France HAD and 95% tax on the rich, but their courts struck it down. I am sure they are busy little beavers re-writing the law to pass muster.
In the meantime those 'evil rich' people are fleeing the country to Belgium and even Mother Russia to avoid the new draconian tax laws, not to mention all the corporations also fleeing the country to protect their earnings. What a sterling success.
Why must liberals always repeat the same mistakes? As I recall either New Jersey or New York passed a similar steep increase on 'evil rich' people through some sort of 'surcharge' for millionaires, they touted how much money the new tax would bring in. End of the day the tax was a total failure, not only did it not bring in anywhere near the projected revenue it actually decreased revenues as those 'evil rich' people simply left the state, most going to Florida.
WT69, even in a progressive tax system, NO ONE IS ENTITLED TO 95% OF WHAT SOMEONE EARNS!
CNN reports, since Sandy Hook.
Check out "End Of Watch".
As I said before the State with the most Gun Deaths is California.
[url]http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/watch/End-of-Watch/6149958805326260112/movies?iq_id=52798118&mid=12967610[/url]#episode=Video-2296499880&filter=online.
Drug Gangs are taking over.
Bring Your Guns to California and Help your Brothers.
At 2:30 pm an 8 year old girl was shot standing with her friends and as a car came by and opened fired at her, they shot her in the leg, in Oakland.
The City says they need more cops, which they do. They have around 600 now. They cut a few hundred in the last few years.
Chicago has 1000.
What they really need is the National Guard.
In July, Whites in California will be the Minority.
Texas will follow.
I don't care about that, but it is the gangs that are taking over.
So, come on you Gun Loving Vigilantes, we need your Help.
[b][u]'Obama claim that 40 percent of gun sales lack background checks get 2 Pinocchios from Washington Post'[/b][/u]
'Despite claims from President Obama and Vice President Biden that 40% of all gun sales aren't subject to a background check, a Washington Post analysis has found that to be incorrect and awarded the president's claim Two Pinocchios. '
[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/update-obama-claim-on-background-checks-moved-from-verdict-pending-to-2-pinocchios/2013/01/25/59caeca6-672f-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_blog.html[/url]
That goes hand and hand with the 'gun-show loophole' lie, federal law for gun purchases at gun shows is the same as the law for gun sales at any other place.
[quote]In 2007, candidate Barack Obama said, "We know what to do. We've got to enforce the gun laws that are on the books." He also alluded to cracking down on straw man purchasers and "unscrupulous gun dealers." He continued to reiterate this view on the campaign trail in 2008, including calls for stronger background checks.”[/quote]Prosecute people who falsify background check information?
[quote]The Obama Administration Justice Department is also not strongly enforcing prosecutions of people who falsify information on their gun background checks. The FBI reported 71,000 instances of people lying on their background checks to buy guns in 2009. But the Justice Department prosecuted a mere 77 cases, or a fraction of 1%.[/quote]What good is a new gun law if we can't or won't enforce current laws?
[url]http://www.policymic.com/articles/22802/gun-control-facts-existing-gun-laws-would-reduce-crime-but-these-are-not-enforced[/url]
Is there a link between Psychiatric medications and mass shootings? I think we need to take a look at everything involved before we destroy the Second Amendment, unless of course your goal is a political agenda.
[url]http://foodmatters.tv/articles-1/is-there-a-link-between-psychiatric-medication-and-mass-shootings[/url]
[QUOTE=Jackson;431375]Facts are not important to liberals, only emotions are important.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Punter 127;431378]Absolutely ' just a pure play on emotion', no concern for freedom. There's no intelligent arguments about the Second Amendment, no genuine concern about addressing the problem, just an agenda that focuses on infringing on the rights of peaceable citizens, not violent criminals.[/QUOTE]Oh lookee... Punter flips my statement, off a quote from Jackson ("Facts are not important to liberals, only emotions are important") who flips another of my statements. Double Trouble ! I see references to the imaginary "evil rich" have also re-surfaced (BTW, it was a 75% tax in France, not 95%).
This is all rather amusing, but juvenile. It's no wonder the Republican party is now engaged in some introspection and soul-searching, assessing why they lost the election and what they can do better next time. They are where they are because they have a credibility problem.
The NRA email speaks for itself. False claims about Obama's fundraising, about Obama's friends hating guns and wanting to reduce your freedom to ashes. Lies aren't facts, folks. It's obvious the NRA email appeals to emotion, not reason. And why is that ? Because the people who run the NRA, like those who run the Republican party, are well-versed in the psychology of their supporters.
[QUOTE=Esten;431394]Oh lookee. Punter flips my statement, off a quote from Jackson ("Facts are not important to liberals, only emotions are important") who flips another of my statements. Double Trouble ![/QUOTE]ROFLMAO, That's a trick we picked up from you.
[QUOTE=Jackson; 431366]"4, 050+
Killed with cars" since Sandy Hook.
When are we finally going to ban cars and stop this madness![/QUOTE]We only need ask ourselves 2 questions:
[i]What would be the impact on society if we were to ban private ownership of cars? [/i]
[i]What would be the impact on society if we were to ban private ownership of guns? [/i]
We regulate a freedom according to the necessity, and the positive vs. negative impacts of each freedom. In the case of cars vs. guns, there is simply no comparison.
My half brother had a gun.
But, he is so dumb, that after I kicked him out of my house, bringing a drunk, a few of his friends let him stay at one of there rentals. But it was in a Black Neighborhood in Richmond.
He was afraid when two kids 14 years Old came to his door, that he had his pistol in hand and told them that if they came back he would blow them away. Of course he had been drinking.
The kids came back after he had left a few days laterand stole his gun.
He is so fucked up, that he did not report it. Two days later they came back for his TV, etc.
They caught the kids and when the police asked about the gun, they said What Gun.
So, lock your Guns up!
The Second Amendment talks about a well armed Militia, not individuals.