Printable View
They costs Came in Lower than what was predicted.
What right wing shit are you reading?
FOX!
California is already Set Up!
The States that are using S.S., the most don't Want It.
WFT!
[QUOTE=Punter127;434915]
[URL]http://news.investors.com/politics/080213-666235-cheap-obamacare-twice-as-costly-as-existing-plans.htm[/URL]
Did someone say [B]“Affordable Care Act”[/B].[/QUOTE]
Here are few laws they are trying to pass in the Worst Congress' History.
[QUOTE=Punter127;434915]
[URL]http://news.investors.com/politics/080213-666235-cheap-obamacare-twice-as-costly-as-existing-plans.htm[/URL]
Did someone say [B]“Affordable Care Act”[/B].[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69;434916]They costs Came in Lower than what was predicted.
What right wing shit are you reading?
FOX!
California is already Set Up!
The States that are using S.S., the most don't Want It.
WFT![/QUOTE]Did you even read it? The link is an INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY editorial, not Fox. I ask you before and I'll ask you again, what's wrong with Fox News? Isn't Fox still the #1 rated cable news channel?
Have we reached a point where I need to request a list of approved reading comrade?
[QUOTE=Doppelganger;434913]Esten, the private system was working fine until the mid to late 1960's when the federal government involved itself in healthcare with the advent of Medicare and Medicaid.
At the time we had a three tier healthcare delivery system:
Physician offices and small clinics were the first or primary tier and the least expensive level of care for common problems.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]The result of this error was the near total destruction of the first two tiers of medical service delivery, which left only the third tier for delivery of all services which was the most expensive level of care.[/QUOTE]Has anyone seen a doctor at a physician office or small clinic in the US?
According to Doppel, they've been pretty much wiped out.
[QUOTE=Punter127;434922]Did you even read it? The link is an INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY editorial, not Fox. I ask you before and I'll ask you again, what's wrong with Fox News? Isn't Fox still the #1 rated cable news channel?
Have we reached a point where I need to request a list of approved reading comrade?[/QUOTE]WT69. Did you read the link? Yes or no? If not why not? If yes what did you not understand?
What is your source of rebuttal?
Put up or shut up.
Don B.
When health care in America started going corporate with the advent of Health Maintenance Organizations, the for-profit business model destroyed private practice in the traditional way. And the community based hospitals also came under more pressure financially. As I remembered it, starting in the 80's, there were a flurry of smaller hospitals closings or mergers. Hospital Administration became a real sought after college major. And so now, even if you love your doctor, you could not go to him as he might not be on your insurance carrier's list.
And thus the death of the private practitioner. No more house calls, no more bartering of payments. As Vegas would say, keep the slots ringing.
[QUOTE=Punter127;434922]Did you even read it? The link is an INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY editorial, not Fox. I ask you before and I'll ask you again, what's wrong with Fox News? Isn't Fox still the #1 rated cable news channel?
Have we reached a point where I need to request a list of approved reading comrade?[/QUOTE]Fox News is #1 in the same way that National Enquirer is #1 in the tabloid sensational gossipy print news. No, feel free to watch Fox, a lot of busty women presenters there, buttons bursting and low cleavage blouses.
[QUOTE=BlackShirt;434926]Fox News is #1 in the same way that National Enquirer is #1 in the tabloid sensational gossipy print news. No, feel free to watch Fox, a lot of busty women presenters there, buttons bursting and low cleavage blouses.[/QUOTE]I believe your comparison falls under the category of false alternative.
Don B.
And these also.
[URL]http://www.businessinsider.com/what-obamas-affordable-care-act-will-cost-consumers-2012-6[/URL]
[url]http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/16/1224215/-Delaying-Affordable-Health-Care-Act-costs-lives#[/url]
[url]http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/healthpolicy/calculator/[/url]
[QUOTE=DonB;434924]WT69. Did you read the link? Yes or no? If not why not? If yes what did you not understand?
What is your source of rebuttal?
Put up or shut up.
Don B.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BlackShirt;434926]Fox News is #1 in the same way that National Enquirer is #1 in the tabloid sensational gossipy print news. No, feel free to watch Fox, a lot of busty women presenters there, buttons bursting and low cleavage blouses.[/QUOTE]Read'em and weap.
Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Thursday, August 1, 2013.
[URL]http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/08/02/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-august-1-2013/195240/[/URL]
Ratings up for Fox News, CNN and HLN and down for MSNBC.
[URL]http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/02/entertainment/la-et-ct-cable-news-ratings-20130702[/URL]
Fox News Crushes MSNBC in Ratings During Zimmerman Trial Verdict.
[URL]http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2013/07/15/fox-news-crushes-msnbc-in-ratings-during-zimmerman-verdict-n1641058[/URL]
Cable News Ratings: Rachel Maddow Sinks With MSNBC, CNN Rebounds, But Fox News Is Still Untouchable.
[URL]http://www.ibtimes.com/cable-news-ratings-rachel-maddow-sinks-msnbc-cnn-rebounds-fox-news-still-untouchable-1333745[/URL]
Q2 2013 Ratings: Fox News #1 for 11 1/2 Years.
[URL]http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/q2-2013-ratings-fox-news-1-for-11-12-years_b186570[/URL]
Fox News Wins The George Zimmerman Verdict Ratings Battle.
[URL]http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-verdict-ratings-fox-news-cnn-msnbc-2013-7[/URL]
[QUOTE=Jackson;434930]Read'em and weap.
Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Thursday, August 1, 2013.
[URL]http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/08/02/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-august-1-2013/195240/[/URL]
Ratings up for Fox News, CNN and HLN and down for MSNBC.
[URL]http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/02/entertainment/la-et-ct-cable-news-ratings-20130702[/URL]
Fox News Crushes MSNBC in Ratings During Zimmerman Trial Verdict.
[URL]http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2013/07/15/fox-news-crushes-msnbc-in-ratings-during-zimmerman-verdict-n1641058[/URL]
Cable News Ratings: Rachel Maddow Sinks With MSNBC, CNN Rebounds, But Fox News Is Still Untouchable.
[URL]http://www.ibtimes.com/cable-news-ratings-rachel-maddow-sinks-msnbc-cnn-rebounds-fox-news-still-untouchable-1333745[/URL]
Q2 2013 Ratings: Fox News #1 for 11 1/2 Years.
[URL]http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/q2-2013-ratings-fox-news-1-for-11-12-years_b186570[/URL]
Fox News Wins The George Zimmerman Verdict Ratings Battle.
[URL]http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-verdict-ratings-fox-news-cnn-msnbc-2013-7[/URL][/QUOTE]
But wouldn't you rather watch Rachel Maddow than Megan Kelly?
Don B.
Meanwhile the DEA under the Obama Administration is raiding state approved Medical Marijuana Clinics throughout the nation.
Pluck Obama!
[QUOTE=BlackShirt;434926] No, feel free to watch Fox, a lot of busty women presenters there, buttons bursting and low cleavage blouses.[/QUOTE]If you don't like busty women in button bursting low cleavage blouses please feel free to watch (no cleavage, wish I had a penis) Rachel Maddow, and if you really want a thrill up your leg you can watch the Ed show. BTW It's easy to get Mr Ed and the Ed show mixed up, one was a talking horse, the other is a talking jackass.
[B]False Promises[/B]
"Obama drummed two unambiguous promises into the public consciousness: "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your current health insurance plan you can keep it." Without these two presidential pledges, Obama Care would have stood no chance." Nancy Pelosi's website is still telling these lies.
"Now anyone who calls for Obama Care's repeal is branded a right wing, wild-eyed partisan-obstructionist, not worthy of a second thought. However, if customers had bought a product under similar false assurances, they would be entitled under fraud laws to return it. Not so with Obama Care, claim its supporters.
[URL]http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2013/08/05/airbrushing-away-the-numerous-false-promises-of-obama-care/[/URL]
WT 69 I'm still waiting for your answers to the Fox News questions.
I don't like FOX because of their slanted (lies) views. And the lack of coverage.
Like this one:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/40811/13-benghazis-happened-under-president-bush-and-fox-news-said-nothing
Here is California's health care costs. The costs will be lower than now.
[URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/23/california-health-insurance-premiums_n_3328110.html[/URL]
[QUOTE=Punter127;434922]Did you even read it? The link is an INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY editorial, not Fox.
I ask you before and I'll ask you again, what's wrong with Fox News? Isn't Fox still the #1 rated cable news channel?
Have we reached a point where I need to request a list of approved reading comrade?[/QUOTE]