ACA has many private insurers
There's a (structured) profit motive built into the Affordable Care Act to support private insurer participation. But not every insurer is necessarily going to participate in every state. Aetna for example, is not participating in the exchanges in three states. One of them being California where Aetna never planned to participate in the first place.
Is California stuck without Aetna? Not at all, there are 12 private insurers with plans that meet ACA standards (Ref. www.coveredca.com):
Alameda Alliance for Health
Anthem Blue Cross of California
Blue Shield of California
Chinese Community Health Plan
Contra Costa Health Plan
Health Net
Kaiser Permanente
L.A. Care Health Plan
Molina Healthcare
Sharp Health Plan
Valley Health Plan
Western Health Advantage
The entire US healthcare system has been and continues to prepare for ACA. The myopic propaganda from Republicans and right-wing media (Faux News, Investors Business Daily, Breitbart, etc) is a tiny sliver of what's going on -- and not to be trusted or taken as representative.
Just like going to Blacks
[QUOTE=Jackson;435013]That's all bullshit.
First, the American people did not have a health crisis before ObamaCare as 85% of American citizens were covered by a medical plan, including every person under the age of 18 and every person over the age of 65.
Second, many Americans were ready "[I]to explore new avenues[/I]" like tort reform and allowing insurers to compete across state lines, but the liberals weren't interested in improving the health care delivery system as their actual goal was to foster more government dependency for their own political aggrandizement.
Thanks,
Jax.[/QUOTE]That is what going to a hospital in America is if you do not have insurance. Yeah, it might work for a few people, but it's a rip-off. And health care in America is a rip off. You know it, and everybody's grandmother knows it.
Health Care & Education should be basic citizen rights. Most GOP reform plans do not touch private insurers. Obama did something, workable or not, we will find out. But doing nothing, and trying to defeat it by calling it socialism is just selfish. We already know how Congresss work, they are not for the people. And too many of Americans are like sheep, easily sway by fear and right-wing jihardists.
It is better to give than to receive.
[QUOTE=Jackson;435026]How noble, except your plan requires a system wherein money is taken at gunpoint from people who earned it for themselves, to be used to buy medical services for strangers who do not wish to pay for their own medical needs.
That's morally repugnant.
Thanks,
Jax[/QUOTE]But you earned your money, you earned the right to spent it anyway you like, or even hide it. So where can you go where you don't have to pay taxes. Monaco, Luxembourg, Cayman Islands, Argentina? Perhaps, only you know.
But there is one thing we know. The powerful will always oppress the powerless, and the rich will earn it on the backs of the poor. And they will do all they can to preserve that advantage. Why are we proud to be Americans? We advocate human dignity. Otherwise, we are no better than Zimbabwe.