[QUOTE=Punter 127;420671]Just what we need [i]'A Rock Star' as[/i] POTUS, [b]'Snake Oil Salesman'[/b] Would be more appropriate.[/QUOTE]I think you are suffering from pussy overload, it's starting to affect your perspective. Once a day is enough.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Punter 127;420671]Just what we need [i]'A Rock Star' as[/i] POTUS, [b]'Snake Oil Salesman'[/b] Would be more appropriate.[/QUOTE]I think you are suffering from pussy overload, it's starting to affect your perspective. Once a day is enough.
[QUOTE=Toymann;420665]so just getting caught up today.[/QUOTE]Well get "caught up" with the fact that you were wrong, and I was right. Keep pushing your Wienie Willard. Keep calling me a liberal although I have never posted anything supporting Obama. We shall see who gets the nomination, notwithstanding Willard's buying off of Fox News, Florida media and everyone else he can get to. 75% of the Republicans appear to agree with me that he is a whining, spoiled Mormon fool and can't stand him. But keep supporting him "Dude", "birds of a feather flock together".
[QUOTE=Toymann;420665]Good old David33 is so capable that he has to live outside the US[/QUOTE]Is that supposed to be another of your well thought out insults? I suppose you are also referring to Jackson.
[QUOTE=El Alamo;420623]I think Albert Einstein got it right when he said that if you are not a liberal when you are 20 years old you have no heart. If you are still a liberal when you are 30 years old you have no brain[/QUOTE]Churchill made the famous statement about how aging turns good hearted liberals into hard headed conservatives. Of course Churchill was a war-mongering racist, who redeemed his very checkered political career with true courage and leadership in WWII.
Einstein was a pacifist who regretted the dawning of the nuclear age. He once described capitalist society, a source of evil and the "predatory phase of human development". Einstein supported socialism as an economic system. He was anticommunist who distrusted the bureaucratic and authoritarian excesses of the Soviet Union.
[QUOTE=David_33;420679]75% of the Republicans appear to agree with me that he is a whining, spoiled Mormon fool and can't stand him. But keep supporting him "Dude", "birds of a feather flock together".[/QUOTE]Where in the world did ya pull that out of? Please reveal your source, local paper in south america? LMAO. Better check out the amount of money Newt just got from his old buddy Vegas tycoon and then his wife (10M all together). I have no issue with politicians raising private money. I only bring this up in response to your comment about Romney buying "everything out". Really don't get your point so please elaborate.
I admit that SC was quite a last minute turn around for Newt. I take my hat off to him actually. The tactics he imployed in SC where obviously effective. In fact, he sounds a lot like Obomanation and the liberal media spin doctors. Success and wealth is bad! Business is bad! Yada Yada Yada. Class warfare at it's finest. Time will tell if Newt and his approach will win the day. I doubt it!
In lieu of your recent increased bravado, why not accept my friendly wager. Or do you feel too insulted to accept. You are taking this dialoug far to seriously David33. You appear to have quite thin skin. LOL. Kinda like most liberals I know.
As I mentioned before, as a result of your past comments, I am attempting to tone down my retoric. I would hate to destroy the board, kill the easter bunny, banish santa, yada, yada, yada.
As far as your political position goes. You have pitched your tent with the esteemed Exon. Like most liberals I know.
Still waiting for your response to my suggested wager (a friendly one). Try not to get your hair all up in a ball dude. It's all good. Happy Mongering All. Toymann.
Ps. If is walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck. MOST LIKELY IT"S A DUCK
[QUOTE=Toymann;420685]You have pitched your tent with the esteemed Exon. Like most liberals I know.[/QUOTE]Please quote ANY comment or post I have made which is in any way politically liberal.
My subjective opinion is that with your personal insults and antagonistic style you have already done more than most to chase away members and spoil the forum. You obviously have your issues. I have no interest in making a bet or having any kind of future dialog with you. You can call that being thin skinned, I call it having good taste.
Maybe you might save the forumn by making some chica posts. Oh. I forgot. Not really your thing. Over and out. Happy Mongering All. Toymann
No comments from the Exons and David33's. I guesse I am the only one watching TV tonight. SC was surprising but the end is beginning. Love the polls regarding Romney matching up with Obama. Not quite what Exon suggested. It is so early but based on what's coming up before Super Tuesday Mitt will be carrying quite a lead by then. Three years ago it took almost 50 states for the democrats to decide on Obomanation over Hillary and somehow they won the election. It won't take that long for the GOP to pick their man! All that liberal media spew about a fractured party will become inconsequential once Romney finished Newt. By my guesse it will be all over by mid-March. The far right may not be fully behind Mitt right now, BUT they would vote for Davis33 or Exon before they voted for Obomanation. Just like the dems 3 years ago the GOP will rally behind Mitt when push comes to shove. Obomanations record will sink him in the end. Happy Mongering All. Toymann
I only predicted South Carolina, fool. I was right and you were wrong. Also please re-post any liberal post or comment I have ever made on the forum. I'm still waiting to see that. From what I have observed, your practice of insulting other posters or ruining threads talking about your fishing prowess or some other off topic subject is despised by most forum members. We can only hope that Jackson gives you the Nibu Rafael quarantine treatment which you so richly deserve. Maybe he could put up a poll on this subject: "should Toymann be given and restricted to, his own thread".
[QUOTE=Toymann;420754]No comments from the Exons and David33's. I guesse I am the only one watching TV tonight. SC was surprising but the end is beginning. Love the polls regarding Romney matching up with Obama. Not quite what Exon suggested. It is so early but based on what's coming up before Super Tuesday Mitt will be carrying quite a lead by then. Three years ago it took almost 50 states for the democrats to decide on Obomanation over Hillary and somehow they won the election. It won't take that long for the GOP to pick their man! All that liberal media spew about a fractured party will become inconsequential once Romney finished Newt. By my guesse it will be all over by mid-March. The far right may not be fully behind Mitt right now, BUT they would vote for Davis33 or Exon before they voted for Obomanation. Just like the dems 3 years ago the GOP will rally behind Mitt when push comes to shove. Obomanations record will sink him in the end. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toymann;420754]The far right may not be fully behind Mitt right now, BUT they would vote for Davis33 or Exon before they voted for Obomanation. Just like the dems 3 years ago the GOP will rally behind Mitt when push comes to shove. Obomanations record will sink him in the end. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]After outspending Gingrich more than $12 to $1 with even more money spent by his secret corporate SuperPacs, Mitt lost 53% against him to 47% for.
Evangelists, who are a huge portion of what you call the far right, will sooner vote for a black Christian with the middle name Hussien, than for a Mormon. They will vote as usual in large numbers in 2012 and skip the top of the ticket if the Rs go with Mitt!
I have been saying for over a year that Obama can't get re-elected!
And then I added, but the Rs could lose.
I didn't dream they would make it so easy for POTUS.
[QUOTE=David_33;420756]Also please re-post any liberal post or comment I have ever made on the forum. I'm still waiting to see that. ".[/QUOTE]So you're bizzare comment about Romney following some Mormon agenda to destroy america if elected wasn't just ignorant but also NOT liberal. Ok. I get it now. Walks like a duck, quaks like a duck, swims like a duck. Must be a duck. Good think you don't live in the US and won't have to endure the Romney mormon agenda once he gets elected. As far as all your other dibble goes. Very passive agressive behavior. Hmmm. More duck like behavior. Happy Mongering All. Toymann.
Ps. So now you speak for the forumn do you. IALOTFLMAO
PPs. Maybe YOU should stick to the topic being discussed and stop making all the insulting comments. Glass house dude.
I am not a genius, but the 2012 presidential election is a foregone conclusion. Basically we have Obama who has demonstrated his total lack of knowledge of free market economies to such an extent that he has eclispsed the incompetence of Jimmy Carter. Then we have Romney, who is being criticized for his understanding of free market economies and his track record of success in free market economies.
Criticizing Romney for his business success and rewarding Obama for his economic incompetence would be similar to benching Tom Brady or Eli Manning because they win ballgames and playing a blind quadaplegic I. E. Obama because he will never, repeat never, win a ballgame.
Read it and weep. It is a done deal.
[QUOTE=El Alamo;420762]I am not a genius, but the 2012 presidential election is a foregone conclusion.[/QUOTE]To call this race a foregone conclusion is reaching a bit. The RCP average has Obama with a 2. 3% lead over Romney, which has been the trend over the last 3 months, more or less. And this is with Obama doing almost zero campaigning. It's going to be an interesting, close race, no doubt. But if you think Romney is going to waltz into the White House, you're dreaming.
[QUOTE=El Alamo; 420762]I am not a genius, but the 2012 presidential election is a foregone conclusion. Basically we have Obama who has demonstrated his total lack of knowledge of free market economies to such an extent that he has eclispsed the incompetence of Jimmy Carter. Then we have Romney, who is being criticized for his understanding of free market economies and his track record of success in free market economies.
Criticizing Romney for his business success and rewarding Obama for his economic incompetence would be similar to benching Tom Brady or Eli Manning because they win ballgames and playing a blind quadaplegic I. E. Obama because he will never, repeat never, win a ballgame.
Read it and weep. It is a done deal.[/QUOTE]I take you are willing to give 10-1 odds. I will bet $100.
[quote=A Political Guru]Circa 2008.
[QUOTE=El Alamo; 391623]This election may be decided by events on the day of the election or the day before the election.
In 1980 the race between Carter and Reagan was considered to be a dead heat. But on the morning of the election the news was filled with something the Iranians were doing with the American hostages (street demonstration or something like that) It was the only newsworthy topic that day.
Reagan won by a landslide because the voting public realized, seeing the carnage on the news reports, that Carter was incapable of handling foreign affairs.
In 2004 there was the last minute Bin Ladin (sp? Tape.
This year, a meltdown in the stock markets on the day before the election or the day of the election, could seal this for Obama. If not, this might be a closer election than some think.[/QUOTE]2012.
[QUOTE=El Alamo; 420762]I am not a genius, but the 2012 presidential election is a foregone conclusion. Basically we have Obama who has demonstrated his total lack of knowledge of free market economies to such an extent that he has eclispsed the incompetence of Jimmy Carter. Then we have Romney, who is being criticized for his understanding of free market economies and his track record of success in free market economies.
Criticizing Romney for his business success and rewarding Obama for his economic incompetence would be similar to benching Tom Brady or Eli Manning because they win ballgames and playing a blind quadaplegic I. E. Obama because he will never, repeat never, win a ballgame.
Read it and weep. It is a done deal.[/QUOTE][/quote]Perhaps not a genius but a Political Guru, he was right before. :)