American Politics during the Obama Presidency

[QUOTE=Esten;412995]Steve Forbes is a long-time Republican, so suggestions that Dems have his magazine in their back pocket seem dubious at best.

But I agree her ranking as "Most Powerful Woman in the World" is odd. It seems she has been supporting some worthwhile causes, but I wouldn't rank her above Merkel or Clinton. I usually change the channel when a story about her comes on, she is too wholesome for me.

Harsh words Walleye, though not surprising from you. Are these the racist comments you are referring to:?

[url]www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX3ZdYbixiw[/url][/QUOTE]

May be a republican and Forbes magazine has long been a very well respected periodical however, I don't think that the magazine could be considered to be a conservative or right-wing mouth organ.

Clinton is much more powerful than Moochelle, so much so that she has a good a chance of getting the Dem 2012 nomination as BHO and kicking the Mooch back to the Windy City (although the chances of a Dem occupying 1600 Penn after 1/20/2013, looks slim now - but two years is an eternity in politics). By the way, go back and search my past posts (Nov/Dec 2008?) about Clinton gaming for 2012 and BHO overstepping his bounds (early-mid 2009) and the backlash that was coming. Then try to show me one post were you have been on target with your wild ass shots in the dark.

They are not harsh words, they are accurate. I hear that they are making a movie about the Obama's move to destroy America, the working title is "Get Whitey." And all this time I thought he was going to be the first post-racial president (soooo historic and all). Read about the poll on how race relations have worsened in the US over the past two years. They were better under the first black president (Clinton).

[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1318727/Race-relations-worse-America--despite-Obamas-presidency-new-poll-reveals.html[/url]

[QUOTE=Wild Walleye; 412993]There are dozens of women that are more powerful than Mouchelle Obama, but kissing their asses may not payoff like kissing MO's.

This woman is a detestable, American-hating, elitist, racist (yes, I said it) snob. Maybe now that she has one this honor, she can be proud of AmeriKa for the second time. [/QUOTE]Wow, I am really disappointed in you. Having a Black couple residing in the White House is really eating you up!

But just to harmonize, I will still buy you lunch in BA or Bangkok when I see you.

[QUOTE=Black Shirt; 413007]Wow, I am really disappointed in you. Having a Black couple residing in the White House is really eating you up!

But just to harmonize, I will still buy you lunch in BA or Bangkok when I see you. [/QUOTE]I don't care what color or sex the president is, so long as we share the same fundamental philosophies.

There is not a racist bone in my body, never have, never will and I won't spend any time defending myself from aspersions contrary to that.

I have, and have had throughout my life, many friends (Esten will find that hard to believe) paramours, business partners and acquaintances from around the globe (including Africa, MENA and other places where most people don't look like me. I have never once thought of any of them as being defined by the color of their skin, the god to which they pray or their caste. I'm not going to start now.

What I object to with the Obamas (both of them) is not that they are black, it is that they both have made racist, anti-white comments. I do not believe that only white people can be racist.

I am looking forward to lunch and harmony, thanks.

[quote]Comparisons of Barack Obama's presidency to Jimmy Carter's miss the point. Carter's presidency did little to change the basic party construct of the nation or to influence its ideology. Reagan's presidency accomplished both.

But Barack Obama is destroying the Democratic party. It may not recover for a long time. In this, he most closely resembles a synthesis of the failed candidacy of George McGovern and the catastrophic presidency of Herbert Hoover. The damage he is doing to his party's image and prospects closely resembles the harm Hoover did to the Republican party, from which it did not recover for 20 years after he left office. And the extent to which Obama is discrediting the Left parallels the damage George McGovern did to his ideological confreres in 1972, when he went down to flaming defeat.

In a sense, America met its first conservative in 1981 and fell in love. We met our first liberal in 2009 and are running away screaming. FDR was too long ago to count, Lyndon Johnson too distracted by Vietnam to make an impact. So Obama is the first full-throated liberal to be president in our lifetimes. And we won't soon forget him and the lessons his failure is teaching us.

Strangely, the Democrats don't yet get it. They whistle a happy tune as they March off the cliff. There is no voice of dissent against Obama's policies, no mumbled animosity, no suppressed discontent. The party is solid as a phalanx behind its leader even as he sends it to political death. It is the Charge of the Light Brigade, and none of them know that 'someone has blundered. '

For decades, the liberal alternative glittered attractively on the sidelines. As income inequality increased and Wall Street bonuses excited class animosity, the possibility of an economic-populist response had become more interesting to voters by the time Obama came along. The hyperactive Bush foreign and military policy made the yearning for peace and isolation stronger. And as conservatives increased our national wealth, the glaring omission of the health-care system loomed larger. Finally, when the depression hit, voters called in the liberals from stage left and asked them to take a shot at turning the country around.

And did they ever! They kept their promises and then some. They tripled the deficit and sent the debt soaring. From the moment George Washington took the oath of office until Obama did, America had borrowed $9 trillion. Under Obama, it has borrowed $3.2 trillion more, in less than two years. Our health-care system was deformed, manufacturing was terrified by the prospect of cap-and-tax, GM was absorbed by the government and conquered by the unions, and federalism was buried in an avalanche of subsidies that turned state governments into branch offices of Washington.

Americans have learned their lesson, just as they learned from Hoover the evils of Republican laissez-faire economics. His legacy cast a shadow over politics until Eisenhower vanquished it with his personal popularity in 1952. But it was not until Nixon and Reagan that anti-Hooverism stopped structuring national elections.

In George McGovern, we all saw the incompetence of liberalism, its disorganization, its extremism, and its ultimate impotence. The best testament to his failure as a candidate is his own discovery of the virtues of private-sector capitalism in his old age. This gentleman — who was never anything less than that — clearly paved the way for Ronald Reagan and the conservative ascendancy.

This is likely not the legacy Obama had in mind when, with his massive ego, limited competence, and paltry experience, he took over the White House. Americans, in a fit of national delusion, made what they now realize was one of their biggest mistakes.

The magnitude of our error — or at least of our understanding of it — will become apparent on November 2, when the GOP will win both houses of Congress, the House by a considerable margin. The 2010 landslide will likely set the record for the largest transfer of House seats in an off- year election. The prior mark of 74 seats in 1922 (a Democratic gain in the wake of Harding's scandals and the Teapot Dome investigation) will probably be eclipsed. But the true measure of the damage Obama has done to his ideology and his party will not be evident for some time. [/quote]Pretty much tells it like it is, and if the left doesn't believe it, they're 'whistling past the graveyard'.




[b][i]Draft Chris Christie for President in 2012. [/b][/i]

[QUOTE=Black Shirt; 413007]Wow, I am really disappointed in you. Having a Black couple residing in the White House is really eating you up!

But just to harmonize, I will still buy you lunch in BA or Bangkok when I see you. [/QUOTE]My problem isn't the color of Barack Obama. It's his eagerness to throw away all that makes America great, in pursuit of a Socialist Utopian vision he learned at the feet of such mentors as Saul Alinsky and a scorn he learned from such mentors as Reverend Wright.

George McCarthy used to call his type 'pinkos'. This was at a time when "Red" (Communist) Russia was a clear and present danger to the USA. Now that color, an inflammatory color on any map, is being used to label states that polled a Republican majority in 2000, and since.

I wanted, and dearly hoped, that our first Black President would be Colin Powell on a Constitutionalist platform, a "Black Eisenhower". Not this Teleprompted figurehead for the Socialist takeover of a country that was once the beacon of Freedom and Opportunity to the "huddled masses" (quote off the Statue of Liberty's plinth) of the world.

I think Obama will do better than expected in the upcoming elections if he can get back on message. The message seems to be the elimination of private sector jobs through draconian tax increases while creating millions and millions of make believe government jobs.

This is a vision voters will reward in November provided the voters are restricted to convicted felons, the mentally challenged and third generation welfare recipients.

And now this from the AP:

"No Social Security COLA expected for 2011"

When did the govt get put in charge of intimate "ports of entry?"

Westy:

I was going to work in my objection to Reds but, I figured I would get labeled as anti-injun.

[QUOTE=Wild Walleye;413010]What I object to with the Obamas (both of them) is not that they are black, it is that they both have made racist, anti-white comments. I do not believe that only white people can be racist.[/QUOTE]I think you are in a fringe minority once again Walleye. The only recent racism story I recall is the Shirley Sherrod episode where a conservative blogger presented something she said out of context, making it appear she racially discriminated against a white farmer. If anything, you can say the (hasty) rush to judgement on this story showed Obama's low tolerance for anti-white racism.

So really, what evidence do you have for your racist allegations of either Obama or his wife. Can you post even one link to a credible news source that provides some proof?

[QUOTE=Punter 127;413028]Pretty much tells it like it is, and if the left doesn't believe it, they're 'whistling past the graveyard'. [/QUOTE]LMAO! Don't know where you got that little essay, but it's mere conservative fantasy.

Esten, you wanted some examples of racism by the Obama's:

As I recall Obama appointed Van Jones as a Czar, then was forced to take his resignation after many racist comments were reported (hard to argue with video – if you had that many on video how many more were there, the Department of Justice is under fire due to having instituted an 'informal policy' of not enforcing the Voting Rights Act if the complainants were white (this attested to by both current and former black and white DOJ attorneys – one currently serving black attorney whose testimony was blocked by the DOJ until it was forced by the commission, least I forget Rev. Wright (who Obama happily threw under the bus when he become inconvenient. These are just a few off the top of my head and before you say 'but that was not Obama' they are 'his people' so he is responsible. You will have to go a long way to convince me the people he associates with do not share his beliefs. Sort of like saying I don't believe in Communism but I attend all the meetings.

As WW I really don't give a fig about a president's color, what I do care about is their policies regarding financial issues, social issues, the scope of the federal government and defense of the nation. I also care about their deportment in office, as how they conduct themselves both at home and abroad reflect directly on the nation as a whole. I believe a case can be made the Obama's have cheapened the office of the presidency (how many presidents have appeared on talk shows at all much less after entering office? In addition to having a tin ear regarding the nation as a whole, as examples I would point to taking their 'date night' out on the town to New York, publicized vacations and Michelle's debacle in Spain while the nation suffers with 9.6% unemployment and a severely depressed economy. I have to say the Obama's must have missed the class on tact and decorum.

I do believe after Nov 2, unlike Clinton who moved to the center after his party lost both houses to the Republicans in 94, Obama will move even further to the left and will veto as much legislation as he can unless overridden by the house. A good example is his current veto of the mortgage / foreclosure bill which would standardize foreclosure forms and practices. Obama cited it would lead to an increase in foreclosures (which if you check have been frozen by most major lenders as well as foreclosure sales, in reality the bill follows his party's policy of standardization.

I do believe the Left is whistling past the graveyard as Nov approaches – cloistering together to reinforce their beliefs the masses are both racist and stupid but will not prevail.

(Now where did I put my pitchfork, tar, feathers and torch?

[QUOTE=Esten;413033]So really, what evidence do you have for your racist allegations of either Obama or his wife. Can you post even one link to a credible news source that provides some proof?[/QUOTE]

Off the top of my head:

-his own words: "The typical white person is a racist"; "this is just how white folks will do you";

-bitter clingers

-His racist painting of his grandmother


-Reverend Wright (take your pick, must be a million examples) LA Post reported (March 16, 2008) that a Newsmax.com correspondent witnessed Sen. Barack Obama attending one of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's anti-white sermons on July 22 and nodding his head in agreement with the black congregation.

-Reverend Lowery at Obama's inauguration (please don't try to tell me that Obama didn't have final say on every word uttered into a microphone that day)

-Van Jones

-Michelle's interview with 60 mins

-The Cambridge police event

-The Obama Justice department dropping a slam dunk case on the New Black Panthers

-The Obama Justice department's handling of the Somali pirate cases

-Michelle's involcation of the term "Whitey" at the Trinity Church in Chicago

-The nomination of Sotomayer to the supremes

-His own words in his books speak volumes about his anti-while beliefs and lists to whom he subscribes: "never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.” and at college “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on,to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names”

The list goes on. Look, if a republican made any equivalent remarks, he would be drummed out of office.

That fact that you won't even consider the possibility won't make Obama like you, he just groups people like you into the Andy Griffith category (good crackers).

I enjoyed watching the "How Do You Create a Job? " debate question backfire on McMahon last week. She thought she had Blumenthal all set up with her simple question. His answer focused largely on government policies, and she came back with a short and concise answer about an entrepreneur taking risk and selling a good or service for more than it costs to make it. She didn't get much reaction aside from some murmuring in the audience. Then Blumenthal responds:

[QUOTE]I don't differ. I'm not going to be an entrepreneur as a Senator. I will do my best to assist entrepreneurs in exactly the way I have just described.[/QUOTE]Upon which, the audience starts applauding for Blumenthal. Applauding!

Here's the full clip, not the version that is cut off after McMahon's answer. Republicans only want people to see the shorter version.

[url]http://radioviceonline.com/blumenthal-on-how-jobs-are-created-I'm-not-going-to-dc-to-be-an-entrepreneur/[/url]

Apparently, Linda McMahon either forgets she is running for Senate, or really doesn't think government has any influence on job creation. Which as we know runs counter to the Republican position of blaming government for the lack of job creation. No wonder she is down 10 points.

Christine O'Donnell released her "I'm Not a Witch" TV ad. She's me??!!! SNL has been spoofing O'Donnell for two weeks now. This woman will go down in history. Here's the original ad (hard to find among all the spoofs) : [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxJyPsmEask [/url]

But my favorite video last week was RNC Chairman Michael Steele being interviewed about whether the minimum wage is unconstitutional. He dodged questions on whether it's a good idea to reduce the minimum wage. And then he got stumped when asked what the minimum wage was. I mean come on. I'm sure a lot of people don't know what the minimum wage is. But a high profile Republican like Steele being interviewed about the minimum wage and he doesn't know? That's just "out of touch".

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qcoo_QKRZuw[/url]

Scene: running down the hall, my index fingers placed securely in each ear

Me (imitating esten) at the top of my lungs: "LA, LA, LA, I'M NOT LISTENING!!!!!"

Has anyone here ever met Esten in person? I ask because I think he is either Ricardo or Ricardo's evil twin.

Look, I am a conservative, I make no bones about it. I am an oath taker and a 3%'er. But I am not a propagandist. I believe in what I say which is evidenced in my willingness to fight for Esten's right to post his 'thoughts' here and to espouse his marxist ideology here and elsewhere. I believe that in a free and fair forum, my ideas and ideals are superior to Esten's. Let the reader make up his own mind.

I am also a realist and a pragmatist. I am also a pretty damn good prognosticator and since I like to keep score, I'd say I am in the top few on AP (that is in being correct as opposed to Right). Esten is in the bottom 10%. I engage in political discourse not to prove that I am right (which I almost always am) but to confront professional propagandists here in a new frontier in the war against America and that for which it stands and freedom in general. Therefore, I feel that Marxists attacks call for responses. I am sure Esten didn't look up the prior 'calls' that I have correctly made because facts are irrelevant to propagandists. This is evidenced by the fact that rather than interpret and respond to any valid post or argument, Esten usually responds with a non sequitur.

As for Linda McMahon, I would be willing to bet that I am a little closer to the facts than Esten. I happen to have first-hand info on McMahon, her statement during the debate and how it is playing in her district as opposed to the dazed and confused brain of a leftist propagandist. My Blumie supporter friends (e.g. the type of folks having fund raisers for him in their homes), are getting some severe pucker factor. He has been derided by lefties and righties all over the airwaves for botching that question. Further, Linda took the gloves off and called him out for his lies, including but not limited to lying multiple times about serving in Vietnam and other issues.

You can spin and re-spin whatever you like. I suspect that you will disappear come November 3rd along with all the other individuals that we are paying (via tarp and other slush funds) to espouse Obama's die-hard, leftist agenda online. You will reappear sometime before the 2012 elections when your benefactor will be unceremoniously tossed from office along with his mooch of a wife. When Marie Antoinette said let them eat cake, the French electorate did not have the power or wherewithal to shove that cake up her cola. Here, it is different.

[QUOTE=Wild Walleye;413038]Has anyone here ever met Esten in person? I ask because I think he is either Ricardo or Ricardo's evil twin.[/QUOTE]I met Esten one night when he came over to the house for a Thursday night AMA meeting.

I thought he was a personable, decent sort of guy.

I would suspect that Ricardo (aka Canitas Guy) probably is an "okay" guy in that respect also.

Jackson

[QUOTE=Wild Walleye; 413038]Scene: running down the hall, my index fingers placed securely in each ear.

Me (imitating esten) at the top of my lungs: "LA, LA, LA, I'm NOT LISTENING! "

[/QUOTE]

Now that's funny. IALOTFLMAO! Tick! Tick! Tick! November is just around the corner! Happy Mongering All. Toymann

[QUOTE=Jackson; 413039]I met Esten one night when he came over to the house for a Thursday night AMA meeting.

I thought he was a personable, decent sort of guy.

I would suspect that Ricardo (aka Canitas Guy) probably is an "okay" guy in that respect also.

Jackson[/QUOTE]Jax,

Thank you for clarifying that Esten is a real person.

Esten,

My apologies for suggesting that you are solely an online entity supporting the marxist overthrow of the US.

You apparently are a real human being that supports the marxist overthrow of the US.

As I have said many times before, some of my closest friends are leftists and I have also gone on record saying that I respect leftists more than rinos (I. E. People that believe in what they say vs. People that do what is politically expedient. So you have that going for you.

I look forward to meeting one of these nights (hopefully at Newport about 5 mins before I depart with my intended amiga).

WW

[QUOTE=Wild Walleye;413031]And now this from the AP:

"No Social Security COLA expected for 2011"

When did the govt get put in charge of intimate "ports of entry?"[/QUOTE]

I'm on Civil Service Retirement and I don't expect any Cost Of Living Adjustment either.

As for the sort of 'cola' WW is referencing, I prefer my chicas sunny-side-up rather than over-easy.

Here's the link that I think says something.

[blue][Unannotated link deleted by Admin][/blue]

Be sure to play the video

Exon

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited to remove what appeared to be an [u]unannotated link to another website[/u]. Please do not post links to other websites without some explanation as to what may be found at the linked webpage. In other words, if you want to post a link to another website, please include some commentary describing what the link is to. [/blue]

[QUOTE=Westy; 413042]I'm on Civil Service Retirement and I don't expect any Cost Of Living Adjustment either.

As for the sort of 'cola' WW is referencing, I prefer my chicas sunny-side-up rather than over-easy. [/QUOTE]No COLA for two years in a row. We know costs have gone up over the past two years so why no COLA? Because those monies are going to others that are more deserving (from Obama's perspective.)

[QUOTE=Jackson; 413039]I met Esten one night when he came over to the house for a Thursday night AMA meeting.

I thought he was a personable, decent sort of guy.

I would suspect that Ricardo (aka Canitas Guy) probably is an "okay" guy in that respect also.

Jackson[/QUOTE]So, reinstate Ricardo, and see if Field Marshall WW will put up the white flag, with Press Attache Toyman trailing.

[QUOTE=Black Shirt;413078]So, reinstate Ricardo, and see if Field Marshall WW will put up the white flag, with Press Attache Toyman trailing.[/QUOTE]The only thing that could send WW into retreat is the five star chica referral I sent him tonight. This would be understandable considering the quality of this chica and her ability to bring even the strongest to their knees (while she is on hers of course!). Never leave your wingman, so we fight together haste en finale. LOL. Happy Mongering All. Toymann

[QUOTE=Toymann;413080]The only thing that could send WW into retreat is the five star chica referral I sent him tonight. This would be understandable considering the quality of this chica and her ability to bring even the strongest to their knees (while she is on hers of course!). Never leave your wingman, so we fight together haste en finale. LOL. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]

must keep posts short. preserve essence. remain focused.

[QUOTE=Toymann;413080]The only thing that could send WW into retreat is the five star chica referral I sent him tonight. This would be understandable considering the quality of this chica and her ability to bring even the strongest to their knees (while she is on hers of course!). Never leave your wingman, so we fight together haste en finale. LOL. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]True. Your exploits have been well documented. I hope you would be kind enough to let me sample your stable when I make it to BA next year.

[QUOTE=Black Shirt;413091]True. Your exploits have been well documented. I hope you would be kind enough to let me sample your stable when I make it to BA next year.[/QUOTE]I will be back in BA the last week of March, first two weeks of April for my usual trip. I never share chicas with wild-ass liberal [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue].

They always try to stiff the girls over 50 pesos just like that [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue] canadian attorney that tried to hagle with Jackson over the monger dinner cost (after the fact) a couple weeks ago because he was a vegan! Talk about a serial antagonist, if I hadn't stepped in at the last moment my buddy was about to show him some love, Montana style. LOL. This normally might have involved an incident that would have been a first for the monger dinner. Somewhat of a messy affair. In Montana the guy who throws the first punch wins 95% of these type encounters. My buddy was raised there and lives by this mantra. The [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue] continually antagonized my chum for the better part of two hours at the dinner table. His first volley started with the desireability of the vegan diet. His best line to my buddy was when he tried to explain that lettuce has protein. When that didn't work he continued on to the superior aspects of the Canadian health care system. Not many that I know would try to explain to a physician that doctors know nothing about healthcare. IALOTFLMAO. I jumped in just before my buddy, steaming mad, was about to apply the Montana Love. What a stupid dope. Couldn't even enjoy a great evening with fellow mongers without offending the guy sitting right beside him. Kinda of sorry I stepped in, after the fact. LOL.

I think something can be arranged Black Shirt.

Happy Mongering,

Toymann

[QUOTE=Toymann;413092]I jumped in just before my buddy, steaming mad, was about to apply the Montana Love. [/QUOTE]Montana Love?

Doesn't that involve sheep?

ROTFLMAO!

Jackson

[QUOTE=Toymann;413092]my buddy was about to show him some love, Montana style...In Montana the guy who throws the first punch wins 95% of these type encounters.[/quote]There is a reason why you stay on the river when fishing in Montana (I. E. Not wandering around the countryside on what might be some Montanan's property. Shoot first, ask questions later.

Montana is the home of some big balls and the host of an annual "Testicle Festival"

[QUOTE=Toymann; 413092]I will be back in BA the last week of March, first two weeks of April for my usual trip. I never share chicas with wild-ass liberal [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue].

They always try to stiff the girls over 50 pesos just like that [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue] canadian attorney that tried to hagle with Jackson over the monger dinner cost (after the fact) a couple weeks ago because he was a vegan! Talk about a serial antagonist, if I hadn't stepped in at the last moment my buddy was about to show him some love, Montana style. LOL. This normally might have involved an incident that would have been a first for the monger dinner. Somewhat of a messy affair. In Montana the guy who throws the first punch wins 95% of these type encounters. My buddy was raised there and lives by this mantra. The [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue] continually antagonized my chum for the better part of two hours at the dinner table. His first volley started with the desireability of the vegan diet. His best line to my buddy was when he tried to explain that lettuce has protein. When that didn't work he continued on to the superior aspects of the Canadian health care system. Not many that I know would try to explain to a physician that doctors know nothing about healthcare. IALOTFLMAO. I jumped in just before my buddy, steaming mad, was about to apply the Montana Love. What a stupid dope. Couldn't even enjoy a great evening with fellow mongers without offending the guy sitting right beside him. Kinda of sorry I stepped in, after the fact. LOL.

I think something can be arranged Black Shirt.

Happy Mongering,

Toymann[/QUOTE]I thought last year Exon and myself convinced El Jeffe that "cocksucker" was both an accepted noun and adjective in the forum. It appears that El Jeffe has a short memory!

Happy Mongering All,

Toymann

[QUOTE=Toymann; 413102]I thought last year Exon and myself convinced El Jeffe that "cocksucker" was both an accepted noun and adjective in the forum. It appears that El Jeffe has a short memory!

Happy Mongering All,

Toymann[/QUOTE][blue]Greetings Toymann,

Actually, all forum members (including Exon) have been and continue to be enjoined from using the term "cocksucker" in reference to other forum members.

Thanks,

Jackson[/blue]

[QUOTE=Jackson;413106][blue]Greetings Toymann,

Actually, all forum members (including Exon) have been and continue to be enjoined from using the term "cocksucker" in reference to other forum members.

Thanks,

Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]

Well, hold on there. What if the other forum member is a chica? E.g., "Jasmine is a tremendous cocksucker."

I thought that this was the sort of free exchange of information this board was intended to foster.

Jackson was kind enough to leave out "rather boring". I am not usually the life of the party, but I enjoy hanging out with fellow mongers. I have met Jackson a few times over the years, and he has always been friendly to me. I have met several others, including even Toymann, though he may not remember. Sidney introduced us while having drinks outside of Newport last year. Toymann shared some private numbers with me (he didn't know I was a liberal though), and I agreed to take a friend of his over to Madahos.

But Walleye is almost always right (he said so himself), so I must admit he is on to something. Having questioned my motives it is just a matter of time before the jig is up! It's better I just come clean now.

Back in 2004 I became greatly concerned about the direction the country was heading under Bush. I felt I had to do something, but what? Become a politician? Write a book? After much deliberation, I decided the best fit for my time and resources would be to influence the political discussion amongst conservatives on the internet, to help them appreciate the merits of liberalism. To begin, I needed to find an internet discussion forum where tens of thousands of conservatives visited to discuss and read politics. After an extensive search, I located a highly influential conservative discussion board masquerading as a mongering website, Argentina Private. I also felt that in order to gain credibility, I needed to participate in the BA mongering scene so that I wasn't automatically dismissed as a propagandist.

Beginning in 2004, I began annual trips to BA to monger and meet AP members, all for the purpose of gaining credibility among the membership. I even fucked some of the chicas, so I could post authentic reviews to improve my credibility and so my cover wouldn't be blown in case they spoke with other AP mongers. This was the toughest part, but I persevered knowing I was doing it for my country.

By 2008 I was ready to begin posting my political propaganda, but as it turned out my efforts weren't needed to help Democrats in 2008. So I continued posting reviews and waited until 2009 to begin posting on politics, all with the intent to influence the 2010 midterm elections.

So there you have it. This would never have come out, but Walleye's keen perception has forced the matter. Say what you will, but I am confident I have influenced tens of thousands of readers of this political thread, enough to have an impact on the 2010 elections. I didn't do all this for nothing you know.

[QUOTE=Esten;413121] I even fucked some of the chicas, so I could post authentic reviews to improve my credibility and so my cover wouldn't be blown in case they spoke with other AP mongers. This was the toughest part, but I persevered knowing I was doing it for my country.[/QUOTE]I remember you now. You weren't such a bad guy. Obviously just confused at the current moment but not a bad guy at all. Tick! Tick! Tick! I may still get my Madahos night on you yet. I am guessing that the senate my end up 49 GOP, 48 Democrat and 3 tea party. That's a clean win and we're on like donkey kong for my night at Madahos. Happy Mongering All. Toymann

[quote]So there you have it. This would never have come out, but Walleye's keen perception has forced the matter. Say what you will, but I am confident I have influenced tens of thousands of readers of this political thread, enough to have an impact on the 2010 elections. I didn't do all this for nothing you know.[/QUOTE]A sleeper agent that goes astray. What's will Control's next move be? I might have to come down to BA to take him in from the cold!

[QUOTE=Black Shirt;413127]A sleeper agent that goes astray. What's will Control's next move be? I might have to come down to BA to take him in from the cold![/QUOTE]You really ought to have closed this message with a Smiley, George.

Esten,

I bet you feel better now. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. You'll get the hang of it, with a little practice:

Esten: "Hello, my name is Esten"

Everybody: "Hello Esten!"

Esten: "and I'm a ... liberal"

Many people have difficulty with the "public confessional" approach but after awhile you'll be sharing "War Stories" with some of your recovering brethren:

"The worst thing I did on Liberalism was ..."
"How addicted to neo-marxism I was."
"How much redistribution I wanted to use today."
"How terrible I felt seeing the growing dependency of the masses on government handouts. I felt we had to do more even though my actions were at the root of the problem"
"Let me tell you about my years serving time as a community organizer..."

We are all here to support you. You are among friends. Step back form the keyboard, take a few deep breaths and think what productive activity could you do instead of participating in such destructive behavior. Maybe chewing gum will help, lots of coffee (lay off the diet coke or you'll end up like Beck), auto-asphyxiation and/or ritualistic masturbation will help. Who knows? Everyone is different.

The important thing is that I think we've had a major breakthrough and I think that you are on the road to getting better.

[QUOTE=Westy;413132]You really ought to have closed this message with a Smiley, George.[/QUOTE]Touche! Karloff

[QUOTE=Black Shirt;413127]A sleeper agent that goes astray. What's will Control's next move be? I might have to come down to BA to take him in from the cold![/QUOTE]Who would've thunk it?

Mel Brooks is a genius

Some one hand me a shovel. It's getting deep guys!

After being a lifelong Republican I finally did it. I am now a registered Democrat.

For those of you ex-pats living in Argentina and insulated by the absurdity of the Tea Party, Sarah Palin (mother grizzley?), and Christine O'Donnell's of the world, you probably won't get it.

I'll take 1000 years of an Obama administration vs 8 years of George W. Bush anytime.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvsMFN9P8AU[/url]

[QUOTE=Moveon; 413175]

I'll take 1000 years of an Obama administration vs 8 years of George W. Bush anytime. [/QUOTE]I could be dead wrong but I would bet the ranch that 1000 years of the Obama Administration would give us 1000 years of unemployment near or above 10% and a national debt approaching 1000X GNP.

It is becoming obvious Obama never read "Economics for Dummies". Furthermore, Obama should demand a refund for that economics class he took in college.

But I should know better. I will be told by some on this board that raising taxes, spending money like drunken sailors and discouraging private sector job creation is the new road to a 1000 years of prosperity.

I guess I'm pretty hopeless at understanding this new math concept.