Printable View
Don't you just love it, when the argument descends to name calling and gross categorizations of the folks you don't agree with and in most cases don't even know? When you lose the argument you resort to name calling and denigrating others with your "labels". I know Jackson and he is nowhere near a right wing radical – though I keep trying to recruit him.
Guys, grow up and quite sniveling, you sound like a bunch of kindergarteners whining about something at recess. Give it a break and move on.
The motherfucking Irony
[QUOTE=Doppelganger]Don't you just love it, when the argument descends to name calling and gross categorizations of the folks you don't agree with and in most cases don't even know? When you lose the argument you resort to name calling and denigrating others with your "labels".[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Doppelganger]grow up and quite sniveling, you sound like a bunch of kindergarteners whining about something at recess.[/QUOTE]smh.
But do continue. Jackson has made it safe for you to post once more. Must be nice to talk out of your ass when a quick PM can silence the opposition. Enjoy your right wing thread.
Regards,
BM.
Jackson,
We have a lot in common, I could say this too.
I am NOT a Rebublican, and I am NOT a conservative.
- I am against the death penalty.
- I am against any government support of religious organizations.
- I am for the legalization of drugs.
- I am for the legalization of commercial sex.
- I am for a woman's right to choose.
- I am for comprehensive sex education.
And calling Sydney your buddy maybe went too far. Withdrawn.
Steve
Now that Ricardo has been banned from putting an alternative point of view, can we rename this thread "Sydney's propaganda against the USA government"?
And I'm not sure about the validity of Walt and Cindy's survey. Maybe it is unfunded, but as a former designer of surveys (Master's Degree in the subject and employed by government and private industry designing them) its about as valid as Congressman Jones' apology to the President. OK, he meant it REALLY sincerely.
Anyone who can say "The Socialist politics practiced by the Obama administration and empowered by AARP " is hardly an impartial source.
Finally, "The Socialist politics practiced by the Obama administration", ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. That is becoming the joke of the decade.
[QUOTE=Sidney]This letter to the AARP says it all. It is a must read regardless of your age. Some people just make sense in what they say. This lady certainly does. Please forward this to everyone on your contact list.
This was sent to Mr. Rand who is the Executive Director of AARP.
Dear Mr. Rand,
Recently you sent us a letter encouraging us to renew our lapsed membership in AARP by the requested date. I know it is not what you were looking for, but this is the most honest response I can give you. Our gap in coverage is merely a microscopic symptom of the real problem, a deepening lack of faith.
While we have proudly maintained our membership for several years and have long admired the AARP goals and principles, regrettably, we can no longer endorse it's abdication of our values. Your letter specifically stated that we can count on AARP to speak up for our rights, yet the voice we hear is not ours. Your offer of being kept up to date on important issues through DIVIDED WE FAIL presents neither an impartial view nor the one we have come to embrace. We do believe that when two parties agree all the time on everything presented to them, one is probably not necessary. But, when the opinions and long term goals are diametrically opposed, the divorce is imminent. This is the philosophy which spawned our 200 years of government.
Once upon a time, we looked forward to being part of the senior demographic. We also looked to AARP to provide certain benefits and give our voice a power we could not possibly hope to achieve on our own. AARP gave us a sense of belonging which we no longer enjoy. The Socialist politics practiced by the Obama administration and empowered by AARP serves only to raise the blood pressure my medical insurance strives to contain. Clearly a conflict of interest there!
We do not understand the AARP posture, feel greatly betrayed by the guiding forces whom we expected to map out our senior years and leave your ranks with a great sense of regret. We mitigate that disappointment with the relief of knowing that we are not contributing to the problem anymore by renewing our membership. There are numerous other organizations which offer discounts without threatening our way of life or offending our sensibilities.
This Presidential Administration scares the living daylights out of us. Not just for ourselves, but for our proud and bloodstained heritage, but even more importantly for our children and grandchildren. Washington has rendered Soylent Green a prophetic cautionary tale rather than a nonfiction scare tactic. I have never in my life endorsed any militant or radical groups, yet now I find myself listening to them. I don't have to agree with them to appreciate the fear which birthed their existence. Their borderline insanity presents little more than a balance to the voice of the Socialist mindset in power. Perhaps I became American by a great stroke of luck in some cosmic uterine lottery, but in my adulthood I CHOOSE to embrace it and nurture the freedoms it represents as well as the responsibilities it requires.
Your website generously offers us the opportunity to receive all communication in Spanish. ARE YOU KIDDING? Someone has broken into our 'house', invaded our home without our invitation or consent. The President has insisted we keep the perpetrator in comfort and learn the perp language so we can communicate our reluctant welcome to them.
I DON'T choose to welcome them.
I DON'T choose to support them.
I DON'T choose to educate them.
I DON'T choose to medicate them, pay for their food or clothing.
American home invaders get arrested.
Please explain to me why foreign lawbreakers can enjoy privileges on American soil that Americans do not get?
Why do some immigrants have to play the game to be welcomed and others only have to break & enter to be welcomed?
We travel for a living. Walt hauls horses all over this great country, averaging over 10,000 miles a month when he is out there. He meets more people than a politician on caffeine overdose. Of all the many good folks he enjoyed on this last 10,000 miles, this trip yielded only ONE supporter of the current administration. One of us is out of touch with mainstream America. Since our poll is conducted without funding, I have more faith in it than one which is power driven.
We have decided to forward this to everyone on our mailing list, and will encourage them to do the same. With several hundred in my address book, I have every faith that the eventual exponential factor will make a credible statement to you.
I am disappointed as hell.
I am scared as hell.
I am MAD as hell, and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!
Walt & Cyndy.
Miller Farms Equine Transport[/QUOTE]Great letter? I can't fathom why anyone would think that letter "says it all." It's nothing more than some crank who says "This Presidential Administration scares the living daylights out of us" [b]for no identifiable reason[/b] -- there's something incoherent in there about a "bloodstained heritage" which is nonsensical, but there's nothing else. Then this lunatic purports to take the AARP to task for [I]offering to send its members communications in Spanish.[/i] Next, the twit jumps to the conclusion that all Spanish speakers in the USA are illegal immigrants. Phew! You like this garbage, huh?
I'm glad you're not a conservative. You'd give us a bad name by endorsing this drivel. If this is what we've got to look forward to, please bring Ricardo back.
There are some real idiots in this world. Glad to know Sidney agrees with their angry racist views.
Regards,
BM
[QUOTE=Stan Da Man]Great letter? I can't fathom why anyone would think that letter "says it all." It's nothing more than some crank who says "This Presidential Administration scares the living daylights out of us" [b]for no identifiable reason[/b] -- there's something incoherent in there about a "bloodstained heritage" which is nonsensical, but there's nothing else. Then this lunatic purports to take the AARP to task for [I]offering to send its members communications in Spanish.[/i] Next, the twit jumps to the conclusion that all Spanish speakers in the USA are illegal immigrants. Phew! You like this garbage, huh?
I'm glad you're not a conservative. You'd give us a bad name by endorsing this drivel. If this is what we've got to look forward to, please bring Ricardo back.[/QUOTE]
I don't agree with you BM.
I you read the letter these folks are obviously speaking about ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, the majority of which are Spanish speaking. They don't wish to participate in supporting them in any way, which is certainly their right to state this opinion.
Regarding their statement about the administration scaring the hell out of them, it is their opinion and they are entitled to it, with or without supporting arguments, or does freedom of speech only apply to liberals and not moderates or conservatives?
If you watch the Rasmussen polling data, the Carmel One's numbers are sliding downward fairly rapidly for a new president. It appears there are a growing number of folks who believe as the authors of the letter do regarding his administration, perhaps not scaring the hell out of them but giving them reason for pause.
By the way, I too am appalled I must "press 1 for English" in my own country. In my travels I have not seen other countries cater to a foreign population as we do in the United States. IMHOP
You're pathetic Sidney. Go cry to Jackson again so no one messes with your right wing propaganda thread. You thrive off of this. Spam emails and angry rhetoric.[QUOTE=Sidney]With his normal drivel and name calling!
[/QUOTE] Glad to know you agree in people being entitled to their opinion dopple. Too bad Ricardo isn't included as per jackson sidney and yourself. Oh wait, maybe whoever wrote this spam email should.
[QUOTE=Doppelganger]grow up and quite sniveling, you sound like a bunch of kindergarteners whining about something at recess.[/QUOTE]My Personal opinion is whoever wrote that is an ignorant angry racist.
[QUOTE=Doppelganger] it is their opinion and they are entitled to it, with or without supporting arguments[/QUOTE]Regards,
BM
[QUOTE=Doppelganger]or does freedom of speech only apply to liberals and not moderates or conservatives?[/QUOTE]You have to remember that liberals believe that [u]THEY[/u] are the moderates.
[QUOTE=Doppelganger]If you watch the Rasmussen polling data.[/QUOTE]As previously stated here, the New York Times is the ONLY organization that conducts accurate polls.
Sidney,
Are they still upset that you are the one with the 14 inch schlong - certified by the Guiness Book of Records.
[QUOTE=Jackson][blue]Ricardo,
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.
Persons (and especially political operatives) participating in the forum solely for the purpose of debating politics are in fact SPAMMING the forum.
Therefor, your next 5 posts must be first person reports of your recent experiences with working girls here in Argentina.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]Fair enough Jackson. It's your show and you make the rules. However, if you are going to be consistent in applying an anti-spamm policy, you could apply your editorial prerogative to stop the endless stream of long-winded, diatribes about US politics and economics being generated daily by other prolific posters from cluttering up this otherwise useful forum. There are numerous other forums for people who want to discuss subjects which are completely irrelevant to the stated purpose of this board.
BM,
Back to name calling I see. I guess anyone who does not agree with you is a right wing angry racist. What a simple and wonderful outlook on life.
I have to agree with Jackson, the site is primarily for the dissemination of information about mongering in Buenos Aires. I have enjoyed the site for years due to all the information contained herein and IMHO the addition of the “political threads” has only detracted from the site.
I seem to be seeing more “political” posts than “chica” posts. What a sad state of affairs.
Please reference where I wrote that?
And yes, calling people sniveling whining kindergardeners is name calling.
But you said that. Not I.
Congrats on your delusional state. Political posts? I haven't made any in years. Sidney on the other hand makes 10 a day.
This thread is pretty much a joke. The one " Liberal " poster got banned for making sense.
Regards,
BM
* waits for more right wing propaganda emails*
[QUOTE=Doppelganger]BM,
Back to name calling I see. I guess anyone who does not agree with you is a right wing angry racist. What a simple and wonderful outlook on life.
I seem to be seeing more "political" posts than "chica" posts. What a sad state of affairs.[/QUOTE]