A news caster suggested that the Republican Candidates play Jeopardy and see if the can answer the really important questions.
I like it.
Printable View
A news caster suggested that the Republican Candidates play Jeopardy and see if the can answer the really important questions.
I like it.
A modern day "Lazarus", Newt Gringrich emerged from being written off to lead the GOP polls. The Republican voters, akin to the Madoff investors continue to ignore the "too good to be true" warning signs of the ultimate insider profiteer of Washington politics. Sometimes, you have to wonder if he is the poster boy of capitalism at it's very best or very worst.
Newt Who? Good if you are 70 years old. Maybe. As I projected almost a year ago. It's a one horse race fellas. Romney wins like secretariate many years ago! By 20 lengths. Still waiting for my be*tch Esten to climb out from under his rock and step up and take my bet. LOL. Doubt we will ever see him again on this thread. Best news for america is Romney is a turn around specialist and thats exactly what we need after the great Obomanation experiment. Damn liberals! Never give those fools the keys to the bus, goes off the road every time! Happy Mongering All. Toymann.
Ps. Here's my prediction for November 2012. North of 65 GOP seats in the senate, Romney gets north of 55% of the popular vote and the house has too many GOP seats to count. LOL. Going to take some serious work to get the ship on track but I think Romney will get the job done! GO ROMNEY GO!
T. E. Lawrence: So long as the Arabs fight tribe against tribe, so long will they be a little people, a silly people. Greedy, barbarous, and cruel, as you are.
History repeats itself.
Sounds like he meant:
Our CONGRESSMEN.
You know Obama's in trouble when Chris "[i]A thrill up my leg[/i]" Matthews turns on Obama.
[url]http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/21/chris-matthews-to-obama-just-tell-us-commander-give-us-our-orders-video/[/url]
In a Sunday evening interview on MSNBC, 'Hardball' host Chris Matthews spoke candidly not just of his allegiance to the president's agenda, but also of the frustrations many on the professional left are feeling with the administration's lack of leadership.
[quote=Chris Matthews]"There's nothing to root for," Matthews lamented. "What are we trying to do in this administration? Why does he want a second term, would he tell us? What's he going to do in his second term, more of this? Is this it? Is this as good as it gets? Where are we going? Are we going to do something his second term? He's yet to tell us."
"He has not said one thing about what he'the do in his second term," Matthews continued. "He never tells us what he's going to do with reforming our health care systems, Medicare, Medicaid. How he's going to reform Social Security? Is he going to deal with long-term debt? How? Is he going to reform the tax system? How?"
"Just tell us — why are we in this with him? Just tell us, commander. Give us our orders and tell us where we're going. Give us the mission."
"And he hasn't done it" Matthews said, blaming not just the president but those closest to him in the White House.
"I think it's the people around him," Matthews asserted."Too many people around are little kids with propeller hats on their heads. They're all virtual — politics, the social networking. Their idea of running a campaign is a virtual universe of sending emails around to people."
A real campaign, the MSNBC host continued, is "meetings with people. It's forging alliances. It's White House meetings and dinner parties that go on 'till midnight. And he should be sitting late at night now with senators and members of Congress and governors working together on how they're going to win this political fight that's coming in 2012."[/QUOTE][url]http://www.theblaze.com/stories/chris-matthews-has-harsh-words-for-obama-i-dont-have-a-sense-that-hes-ever-had-a-meeting/[/url]
[quote=Chris Matthews]Don’t you feel, I think everybody feels an absence of communication from the time he’s been elected. And it’s not about not being left-wing enough or too left. That’s not his problem. It’s connection. And Mrs. Obama, she’s an amazing asset. And what has she done? Obesity? How about connecting with the American people about being Americans? I don‘t think she’s, I don‘t think she’s happy. I don’t think they like being in the White House. The American people can tell that. They don’t seem thrilled at the fact the American people have selected them as our first family. I don’t sense the gratitude, the happiness level, the thrill of being president. Bill Clinton loved being president every minute and you knew it.[/quote]I especially like the "[i]And I think it's the people around him,... [b]they're little kids with propellers on their heads.[/b][/i]"
We are fucked. Can't stop the spending. Every cent sent to Washington DC is money flushed down the toilet. The government puts new meaning to the concept of spending money like drunken sailors.
I say we send everyone in the united States seeking medical care to Cuba. Cuba can do it cheaper than us and apparently, judging from thier life expectancy, better than us. Also, any adverse outcomes would have to be adjudicated in the Cuban court system. That should take care of our malpractice mess.
Also, just for good measure, I think we should start of policy of you were born with your own kidneys, heart, lungs, liver etc. When yours runs out of gas, tough shit. Also a cancer diagnosis should be considered just bad luck. Go to Cuba for 100 year old out of date therapy and quit complaining.
Just when you think the world is coming to an end a glimmer of hope emerges.
Barney Franks, who single handedly created the real estate bubble and subsequent Obama depression, is going to retire.
Page boys can remove their chastity belts, bend over to pick up loose change and collect their paychecks without first giving Barney a BJ. It is safe to go in the water again.
Ah, Herman Cain, as if you did not know that you had some skeletons in your closet, and that they would be flushed out? Or maybe, is it just your escapades are every much your normal everyday behavior and you see nothing wrong with them? Sure, we all have our moments that we are not proud of, but your talk and actions show that you thought that you were indestructible. Obama has not shown us that he is a great president yet, but you don't measured up to him in any category except for bluster. You did not do your people proud.
[QUOTE=El Alamo; 420105]Just when you think the world is coming to an end a glimmer of hope emerges.
Barney Franks, who single handedly created the real estate bubble and subsequent Obama depression, is going to retire.
Page boys can remove their chastity belts, bend over to pick up loose change and collect their paychecks without first giving Barney a BJ. It is safe to go in the water again.[/QUOTE]Reminds me of the old joke. Q: Why don't congressman use book markers? A: They like their pages bent over. LOL.
There are actually two messages here. The 1st is very.
Interesting, but the 2nd is absolutely astounding. And explains a lot.
A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very.
Interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International.
Health Organization.
Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years.
After diagnosis:
USA 65%
England 46%
Canada 42%
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received.
Treatment within six months:
USA 93%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it.
Within six months:
USA 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within.
One month:
USA 77%
England 40%
Canada 43%
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million.
People:
USA 71.
England 14.
Canada 18.
Percentage of seniors (65+) , with low income, who say they are.
In "excellent health":
USA 12%
England 2%
Canada 6%
And now for the last statistic:
National Health Insurance?
USA NO.
England YES.
Canada YES.
Check this last set of statistics!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked.
In the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
You know what the private business sector is. A real-life business, not a.
Government job. Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt. 38%
Taft. 40%
Wilson. 52%
Harding. 49%
Coolidge. 48%
Hoover. 42%
F. Roosevelt. 50%
Truman. 50%
Eisenhower. 57%
Kennedy. 30%
Johnson. 47%
Nixon. 53%
Ford. 42%
Carter. 32%
Reagan. 56%
GH Bush. 51%
Clinton. 39%
GW Bush. 55%
Obama. 8%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
Only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
That's right! Only eight percent-the least, by far, of the.
Last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big.
Corporations how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one.
With the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk.
About business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has.
Never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff.
And closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia,
Government and / or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."
"One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that.
You will be governed by your inferiors." Plato
This post cites a claim made by the discredited Glenn Beck who used inaccurate data promoted by the ultra conservative American Enterprise Institute that quoted a study by an individual who had already admitted his statistics were flawed.
But hey facts aren't really important on internet blogs- including AP
[QUOTE=El Alamo; 419946]Here is Obama's latest brainstorm on how to reduce unemployment, make America more competitive and get the economy moving again.
A 15 cent tax on the sale of Christmas Trees. The tax is to be used to improve the image of Christmas trees.
Number one, when did the image of Christmas trees need to be improved and number two, what business is it of the government to try to improve the image of Christmas trees.
I would gladly swap the braindead, milktoast, politically correct Obama we have now for an Obama who was world class sexual predator, pedophile, and serial killer but understood something about how economies function.[/QUOTE]Don't be so hard on Tiger. Obama is screwing the WHOLE country!
TL
Now that the 9-9-9 Cain show has trotted off into the sunset we now have the latest laughable right-wing circus act.
Donald Trump will be hosting an up and upcoming Republican debate.
I have seen it all, my friends.
A Trump debate is not only laughable but clearly is making a mockery of the Republican Party.
This truly is Presidential!
Can't wait to see this new Apprentice act.
[QUOTE=Moveon; 420181]Now that the 9-9-9 Cain show has trotted off into the sunset we now have the latest laughable right-wing circus act.
Donald Trump will be hosting an up and upcoming Republican debate.
I have seen it all, my friends.
A Trump debate is not only laughable but clearly is making a mockery of the Republican Party.
This truly is Presidential!
Can't wait to see this new Apprentice act.[/QUOTE]That's one man's opinion.
Thanks,
Jackson
Interviewing Huntsman, Hannity said he could never serve as an ambassador under Obama, as he was not sure what kind of American Obama is. This is a guy who has sold his soul so that he can continue to misquote and misrepresent any issue for ratings, and he felt that Trump has alot to offer this country since he qualify under "being so successful and rich".
As for Trump, anybody that has that kind of hairpiece is a first class fraud.
[QUOTE=Black Shirt; 420184]Interviewing Huntsman, Hannity said he could never serve as an ambassador under Obama, as he was not sure what kind of American Obama is. This is a guy who has sold his soul so that he can continue to misquote and misrepresent any issue for ratings, and he felt that Trump has alot to offer this country since he qualify under "being so successful and rich".
As for Trump, anybody that has that kind of hairpiece is a first class fraud.[/QUOTE]Trump is in truth a second-rate fraud!
[QUOTE=Moveon; 420181]Now that the 9-9-9 Cain show has trotted off into the sunset we now have the latest laughable right-wing circus act.
Donald Trump will be hosting an up and upcoming Republican debate.
I have seen it all, my friends.
A Trump debate is not only laughable but clearly is making a mockery of the Republican Party.
This truly is Presidential!
Can't wait to see this new Apprentice act.[/QUOTE]"It feels so good to be back here at the Dexter Lake Club"
Trump is no less qualified to host a debate than any of the other jaded, biased, predisposed, liberal hacks who have hosted past debates. I'm no Trump fan (he wouldn't know a conservative if it pulled the rug off the top of his head) but lets be honest, he is a tv personality just like all the talentless folks who get passed off as "news" people.
[i]"trotted off into the sunset"[/i]
[i]"laughable right-wing circus act"[/i]
[i]"mockery of the Republican Party"[/i]
Amazing. The election in almost a year away, the Republicans haven't even selected their candidate, and yet the left wing "politics of personal destruction" has already begun.
Here's a radical idea for you Obama sycophants: How about we have a discussion about how to solve the issues facing our country instead of personally attacking anyone who disagrees with you.
Answer: Because the liberals can't win on the merits of their arguments, and they all know it.
Thanks,
Jackson
[QUOTE=Jackson; 420187][i]"the left wing "politics of personal destruction" has already begun.
Obama sycophants. Personally attacking anyone who disagrees with you.
Jackson[/QUOTE]Jacko. The Republican candidates weekly TV series. Debates of the Giants. Are mostly one candidate personally attacking another. Doing liberals work and saving voters time in concluding who has answers to the economic crisis your buddies visited on the globe.
[quote]Sol Sanders | Follow the money No. 97 | A pipeline to. Well, almost. Eternity.
Camouflaged by Congressional political badminton and Pres. Barack Obama's demagoguery, the Keystone XL Pipeline Project represents solutions to economic and security issues far exceeding its general appreciation.
Half truths on all sides have obscured the project's underlying fundamentals. Some are only emerging as additional research and technology is applied – most of it, for a change, good news in that it boosts estimates of access to available North American new fossil fuels reserves even if at higher prices.
Contrary to claims of Congressional proponents, the project is not an immediate positive economic bonanza. Like all natural resource development projects, construction employment will be temporary and jobs minimal when the pipeline is actually functional. Of course, given the current environment, any new jobs of any duration not added to the public payroll. The project is funded privately at something over $7 billion. Is a godsend.
Its importance lies in its contribution to what should be a longer term USA energy strategy, a consideration often missing in heated partisan debate.
First of all, direct access to the Canadian tar sands affords fallback access for the almost bottomless USA energy maw – developing rapidly long- term whatever the short-term diminished demand of a temporarily crippled economy. Scandal after scandal is proving the Obama Administration's so-called green energy strategy corrupt as well as wasteful and ineffectual. Keystone, on the other hand, would put crude into the Texas petrochemical refinery complex already absorbing Venezuela's similar heavier oil – those reserves recently reestimated upward with spectacular finds on the Orinoco River.
That would give the USA not only an emergency alternative to the Venezuelan crude, fourth largest of our import sources, but leverage against the machinations of gringo-baiting Venezuelan Pres. Hugo Chavez. Given that country's long troubled history, necessary insurance is needed even in a post-Chavez Venezuela [soon perhaps with reports the fiery demagogue may soon fall victim to cancer largely untreated so he could continue exercising his one-man rule].
The expanded pipeline proposal also now would pick up on its way the more attractive sweet crude from the Bakken strike in North Dakota, already one of the largest in USA history and apparently linked by new successful prospecting and new shale recovery technologies to huge neighboring regional deposits. With Bakken already having added an estimated 10% to American reserves, these could turn into the largest petroleum find in USA history.
As the pipeline travels south, it also aims at untangling a crude gathering traffic jam in Oklahoma and expanding the tanker delivery scene on the Texas coast.
But radical environmentalists had chosen – with the help of the usual Hollywood suspects assuaging their guilt for their gratuitously huge earnings – to make Keystone a major test. That was despite three years research by experts for the State Dept. Had not turned up sufficient environmental issues to block the project. When local interests in Nebraska– ignoring the relatively clean record of the country's vast pipeline networks – argued spills might threaten a critical local aquifer, the Canadian company countered with a $100-million-dollar detour around it.
Washington rumors are Sec. Of State Hillary Clinton was not only not consulted but not forewarned when Pres. Obama, anticipating the 2011 election, threw a bouquet to enviromentalistas who had been increasingly jaundiced at his 2008 promises. But with even normally loyal trade unionists joining the outcry against the White House postponement to go ahead until after next year's election, it was inevitable the issue would become a cudgel for the Republicans.
Canadian threats to transfer their affections to the Chinese market might have some validity – although even Chavez is arranging swaps with Iran for his Chinese sales with Venezuelan crude supposedly sold to Beijing flowing into Texas. But level-headed Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper – an economist and native of Canada's provincial giant oilwell, Alberta– may have overestimated American common sense. [Recent hints suggest Ottawa feels it is dealing with an overburdened, troubled USA and has to demonstrate inordinate patience for both their sakes. One has to wonder what the two chief executives talk about in frequent and what appear to be pleasant meetings! ] But, in fact, Canada's role as No. 1 foreign energy supplier to the USA– something forgotten in much of the talk about 'American energy independence' – probably, rightfully, isn't going away in the near future. The Republicans may be seeing to that.[/QUOTE]For Obama to block or even delay the Keystone pipeline is just utter madness!
Obama considers the private sector to be a nuisance. In Obama's perfect world, everyone would be community organizers. For Obama the private sector is only a source to extort money in order to reward birdbrain solar energy advocates, welfare recipients and various supporters who have no idea what a real job is.
Obama, when it comes to the economy, is more clueless than Jimmy Carter. Fortuneately for us Jimmy Carter was replaced by someone who understand the power of the private sector. We might not be so lucky this time.
Well, as American troops come home, leaving Iraq to chaos and civil war, you would think that it is time to rethink foreign policy. But at the last Iowa Republican presidential debate, most candidates were ready to bomb Iran when ask what they will do if Iran started to blockade the Straits of Hormutz. Only Paul and Houseman seem to think that there could be other options. I guess we can't have the world's greatest fighting force just relaxing for a while. And then we are told that we will be committing sucide if there are any cuts in the defense budget. The War Machine is still alive and humming.
After watching the folks in Washington, both Democrat (spend, spend, spend) and Republican (apparently leaderless) , for the last few years it makes you wonder if the ending of Tom Clancy's book 'Debt of Honor' would not be the best of all possible outcomes!
[QUOTE=Black Shirt;420324]Well, as American troops come home, leaving Iraq to chaos and civil war, you would think that it is time to rethink foreign policy. But at the last Iowa Republican presidential debate, most candidates were ready to bomb Iran when ask what they will do if Iran started to blockade the Straits of Hormutz. Only Paul and Houseman seem to think that there could be other options. I guess we can't have the world's greatest fighting force just relaxing for a while. And then we are told that we will be committing sucide if there are any cuts in the defense budget. The War Machine is still alive and humming.[/QUOTE]So what do you and Canitasguy think should be our response to a 'blockade the Straits of Hormutz'?
[QUOTE=Punter 127;420328]So what do you and Canitasguy think should be our response to a 'blockade the Straits of Hormutz'?[/QUOTE]What with Christmas shopping, wrapping gifts, drinking punch and kissing my chicas under the mistletoe, I guess I missed the news on the blockade! Looking at the news I see the media missed it too! Punter. Maybe you better head over there and check your sources. And why aren't you more worried about a blockade of the Panama Canal by Danny and Hugo (a global security expert like you should easily figure out who they are?)
[QUOTE=Punter 127;420328]So what do you and Canitasguy think should be our response to a 'blockade the Straits of Hormutz'?[/QUOTE]Bring all of the NATO warships to the strait and park them there. Talk to all nations about splitting up the assets of Iran. Bring in the towing ships to dig out the sunken wrecks. Be ready to invade
[QUOTE=Punter 127;420328]So what do you and Canitasguy think should be our response to a 'blockade the Straits of Hormutz'?[/QUOTE]There are numerous stategies, but being macho is not one of them. Does China feel it need to bomb Iran.
So, is it because we are "leader of the free world" (Military / Industrial Complex) or is it because of our mega-consumption of energy (Big Buisness) that drives our foreign policy? We are told that the world's resources of oil is infinite. So we continue to ridicule alternative energy and ignore alternative lifestyles. Our problems are mostly self-inflicted, e. g. Congress.
"Excess" describes our lifestyle, yet, most would not even know what that means. Is that why Americans laugh at the guys who wear speedos? A couple of my friends came to visit me in Bangkok, they work very hard and makes over 6 figures yearly. They threw money around, plenty from where that came from. They are within 6/7 years of 65, yet, none of them are financially ready to retire and will continue to work past 65. That's America for you.
Anyway, I want to take this opportunity to wish everyone Happy Holidays (politically correct).
[QUOTE=Black Shirt;420331]There are numerous stategies, but being macho is not one of them. Does China feel it need to bomb Iran.[/quote]Are you joking? How many days would China accept her economy being paralyzed before they would take action? Do you think Iran will stop oil going to China?
Would you mind sharing with us some of these 'numerous strategies' you speak of?
Would 'numerous strategies' be akin to the strategy used in Libya, or the one used to destroy our relationship with Pakistan or perhaps our current Iraq strategy? How about the strategy of thumbing our nose at our Canadian friends over the Keystone pipeline?
[quote]So, is it because we are "leader of the free world" (Military / Industrial Complex) or is it because of our mega-consumption of energy (Big Buisness) that drives our foreign policy? We are told that the world's resources of oil is infinite. So we continue to ridicule alternative energy and ignore alternative lifestyles. Our problems are mostly self-inflicted, e. g. Congress.[/quote]Funny thing, seems like everything was the Presidents fault when Bush was in office, now it's Congress? Who's fault was it when the Democrats controlled Congress and the White House?
How much of a role did Congress play in Libya?
When alternative energies become economically feasible and safe the world will embrace them.
Should we build more nukes?
What 'alternative lifestyles' are you talking about, do you want us to go back to riding horses, or living in the woods and eating nuts and berries?
[quote]"Excess" describes our lifestyle, yet, most would not even know what that means. Is that why Americans laugh at the guys who wear speedos? A couple of my friends came to visit me in Bangkok, they work very hard and makes over 6 figures yearly. They threw money around, plenty from where that came from. They are within 6/7 years of 65, yet, none of them are financially ready to retire and will continue to work past 65. That's America for you.[/quote]I don't really see what wearing Speedos has to do with the Straits Hormuz, but I'm guilty of laughing when I see fat old men in Speedos, but I also laugh when I see ladyboys strutting down Beach road in Pattaya. (can you connect the dots?)
However I do not laugh at the fat old Russian ladies on Pattaya beach in bikinis, they make me puke.
In one paragraph you have judged people that think guys in Speedos are funny, you have judged your friends for the way they spend the money [u][b]they earned[/u][/b], and their lifestyle, and you have stereotyped your friends and the American people. [b]WOW[/b] That's some paragraph.
FYI my first job was at the age of 12 and I retired at the age of 57, I live in a condo in Cebu Philippines and I maintain an apartment in Pattaya Thailand. I would be living in BA but it just became to expensive. Twice a year I visit the USA with side trips to South America and/or Europe, and plan to visit more Asian countries in the future.
How do I fit your American stereotype?
Now let me see if I can clarify my original question to you. What do you think [strike] America[/strike] the 'World' should do if the Straits Hormuz are blocked tomorrow? I'm primarily interested in what you think we should do if it happens tomorrow, not what we should have done in the past or what our long term strategies should be.
I suspect you will continue to avoid the question.
You do understand that we're talking about World economies being paralyzed, right?
Iran's threat in the Straits Hormuz is a prime example of why we need the Keystone pipeline, and why we need to utilize our own resources. Then and only then should we look at fantasy world make you feel good alternatives.
[quote]Anyway, I want to take this opportunity to wish everyone Happy Holidays (politically correct).[/QUOTE]Thanks, I'll take this opportunity as well to wish everyone a Merry Christmas, and a happy New Year. I hope I haven't offended anyone but for me Christmas will always be Christmas, and I refuse to kowtow to political correctness.
If the Straits of Hormutz was blockaded by President Ahmadinejad tomorrow, I would invite him to meet me in Yalta in order to apologize for our past misdeeds, in particular, our overthrowing the ruling government in 1953 and installing the Shah as our puppet. I would personally kill him using a special CIA-designed tie. Right in front of a shocked Putin, to whom I say,"behave, or you could be next'.
The I will go to the American public to announce that we are now on a war footing and that there will now be a military draft, that petrol will be rationed, kids will go to school 6 days a week, and food consumption will be based on colories required by job classification. I am sure Americans are willing to walk rather than drive to the 7-11 and eat a regular hamburger rather the quarter-pounder or double / double. We will have a leaner and meaner American tomorrow instead of the bloated and bankrupt America today.
I will be reelected in 2012.
The more pertinent question is what would lead Iran to block the Straits of Hormutz. It would do so only in retaiiation for sanctions it deem to punish and isolate Iran. History is repeating itself here. Sanctions did not seem to work against Iraq, Cuba, Myanmar except to make it's people suffer. And going back futher, Japan and Pearl Harbor. Sanctions denying oil to Japan because of their expansionist policies by the same western colonial club who had already divy up the world between themselves. Basically saying,"you can't join the club because you are too late".
Israel & Palestine, that is the thorn in our relationship with the Middle East. But oil, black gold remains the love of our lives. We will surely kill for it.
Our perspective and loyalty really depends on which side of the fence we are on, and how it will affect our lives and pocketbooks. Yes, we are human after all.
The movie "Air America" was on the TV the other day." Watch it or Get it "On Demand" or Buy It.
In case you Young Republican Americans don't remember or have ever been in the Vietnam War or seen it, you should watch the Movie! "in Search Of Oil!
It was one of the first real news articles about the Republican Party's Fuck Ups in Vietman.
The Third Republican Fuck Up War is now Over. Good thing a Republican is not in office, or he War would be Still Going On, In Some Form or another.
Peace be With Us! and You!
Now if we can end the Second Re-pubic-can War in Afghanistan that would Sweet.
How many friends did you lose in those wars?
I did!
Or was it how many of your Profits that you lost or you made?
From a Poem or Music or the 60s ; How does it Go "Cold Hearted Bastards"?
[QUOTE=WorldTravel69; 420350]The movie "Air America" was on the TV the other day." Watch it or Get it "On Demand" or Buy It.
In case you Young Republican Americans don't remember or have ever been in the Vietnam War or seen it, you should watch the Movie!"in Search Of Oil!
It was one of the first real news articles about the Republican Party's Fuck Ups in Vietman.
The Third Republican Fuck Up War is now Over. Good thing a Republican is not in office, or he War would be Still Going On, In Some Form or another.
Peace be With Us! And You!
Now if we can end the Second Re-pubic-can War in Afghanistan that would Sweet.
How many friends did you lose in those wars?
I did!
Or was it how many of your Profits that you lost or you made?
From a Poem or Music or the 60s; How does it Go "Cold Hearted Bastards"?[/QUOTE]For a guy that has constantly pleaded with the admin to close this thread (along with your hopeless wingman TL) WHY DO YOU POST HERE? Sorry, WT69 but your usefulness on this board is coming to an end old fella. Your privado posts are long out of date and really seem little help to the "privado crowd". Why not come back to Argentina and start updating your privado posts. Your posts on this thread just make it all too clear that you may be loosing it! Better to burn out than to fade away dude. Say Hi to Nancy for me at breakfast manana. Happy Mongering All. Toymann
Maybe you are too young to remember Our History?"
Is Greeead that Greaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
[QUOTE=Toymann;420352]For a guy that has constantly pleaded with the admin to close this thread (along with your hopeless wingman TL) WHY DO YOU POST HERE? Sorry, WT69 but your usefulness on this board is coming to an end old fella. Your privado posts are long out of date and really seem little help to the "privado crowd". Why not come back to Argentina and start updating your privado posts. Your posts on this thread just make it all too clear that you may be loosing it! Better to burn out than to fade away dude. Say Hi to Nancy for me at breakfast manana. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]
My next trip is in C. A.
Working for your pleasures.
[QUOTE=Toymann;420352]For a guy that has constantly pleaded with the admin to close this thread (along with your hopeless wingman TL) WHY DO YOU POST HERE? Sorry, WT69 but your usefulness on this board is coming to an end old fella. Your privado posts are long out of date and really seem little help to the "privado crowd". Why not come back to Argentina and start updating your privado posts. Your posts on this thread just make it all too clear that you may be loosing it! Better to burn out than to fade away dude. Say Hi to Nancy for me at breakfast manana. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]
WT,
Is this so? If true, that is good news. Have some real estate in San Juan Del Sur (investment). Would be nice to combine that with a bit of pleasure. The chica rates are not available in many within this list. Any updates due?
In either case, thanks for your efforts.
Best,
Ken
Join us, if you want to on the 15th of January.
We, my buddies Bayboy and DerChef will be there for 10 days.
We are going to meet a few other mongers there.
So far our plans are 4 days in Managua, three or so in Granada and a few in San Juan del Sur.
[QUOTE=Ken Brown; 420356]WT,
Is this so? If true, that is good news. Have some real estate in San Juan Del Sur (investment). Would be nice to combine that with a bit of pleasure. The chica rates are not available in many within this list. Any updates due?
In either case, thanks for your efforts.
Best,
Ken[/QUOTE]
I was thinking about working on the List in April, but since my finances do not qualify me as being in the Middle Class, I need you to pay Jackson my dues and two weeks rent at the Mansion.
Thanks Brother Toymann.
[QUOTE=Toymann;420352]For a guy that has constantly pleaded with the admin to close this thread (along with your hopeless wingman TL) WHY DO YOU POST HERE? Sorry, WT69 but your usefulness on this board is coming to an end old fella. Your privado posts are long out of date and really seem little help to the "privado crowd". Why not come back to Argentina and start updating your privado posts. Your posts on this thread just make it all too clear that you may be loosing it! Better to burn out than to fade away dude. Say Hi to Nancy for me at breakfast manana. Happy Mongering All. Toymann[/QUOTE]
Kinda looks like the rats are deserting the ship.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7mwP5Di5NE&feature=player_embedded[/url]
[QUOTE=Toymann; 415651]Be afraid Esten, BE VERY AFRAID! Tick Tick Tick. Go Mitt Romney in 2012! It's a done deal. Just remember who told ya first buddy. Happy Mongering All. Toymann.
Ps. It doesn't matter who the VP nomination will be. VP's just pick the music for the dance on Saturday night. LOL![/QUOTE]This quote is from 2/17/2010 (long ago in this thread). So it begins. Just remember who went on the record long ago. I am quite looking forward to seeing Mitt kick Obomanation around like a sad little teleprompter fraud later this year. Still waiting for Esten to crawl out from under his rock. A moderate business orientated republican in the White house combined with a republican senate and house is certainly our only hope for a US comback in the coming years. Never underestimate the US people dudes. Never forget who called this long ago. Happy Mongering All. Toymann
[QUOTE=Exon123; 420405]Mitt Romney's landslide victory in Iowa was by a mear 8 votes.
But the fact is after spending in the neighborhood of 5 million dollars in Iowa this time, he actually recieved 6 fewer votes than he did 4 years ago, in my humble opinion he lost big time.
Now the CockSucker will probably win New Hampshire, it will be closer than people think. But after that things are going to get whole lot harder since the MotherFucker's got South Carolina & Florida in front of him and by then the competition is going to start "picking on Him", Newt has already promised to shoot his "Wad" at Romney which is going to weaken him "Mucho"
But I hope the MotherFucker get's the nomination. The reason? , Romney would be the "Easiest to Beat" in the general election next fall.
Now to win the Presidency the CockSucker's got to win the South, and those "Bible Belt","Bible Thumping" Southern Baptist right wing religious MotherFuckers are "Not" going to elect a member of a "Religious Cult". Their Christian's and won't deal with the "Devil".
Toymann, you might be able to "out Fish me" and "out Fuck me" but I know mt Politic's
By the way, Rio Man" stopped by my house for a couple nights 3 weeks ago, we had a Blast.
Hope to see you in March.
Exon[/QUOTE]Brother Ex. Hope we can connect in March for sure. As far as your polical savy and post goes I will repost it for all to see at the correct moment. That will be sometime in Nov 2012. LOL. Monger On Buddy. Toymann