Thread: Live the Dream: Chronology of an experiment

+ Submit Report
Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 177
This blog is moderated by MCSE
  1. #132
    Administrator


    Posts: 2556

    Venues: 398
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimito Cartero
    So that would be answer, be, a pussy, then?

    You are a smart guy, Jackson, but you allow so much BS to go on all the time, and only act when the building is totally engulfed in flames, and it's way too late. Get your balls back from whomever has them, and actually do something.

    In addiction circles, I think you'd be labeled an enabler.
    JC,

    Your analogy is inaccurate. The building is not "totally engulfed in flames", but there is a roaring fire in the fireplace.

    Besides, I've gotten to the point that I now enjoy reading Exon's idiotic theories.

    Thanks,

    Jackson

  2. #131

    Jackson is a

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackson
    Because sometimes I decide that it's not prudent to add fuel to a fire.
    So that would be answer, B, a pussy, then?

    You are a smart guy, Jackson, but you allow so much BS to go on all the time, and only act when the building is totally engulfed in flames, and it's way too late. Get your balls back from whomever has them, and actually do something.

    In addiction circles, I think you'd be labeled an enabler.

  3. #130
    Administrator


    Posts: 2556

    Venues: 398
    Exon,

    I thought that this post was the most illogical thing you've ever written.

    http://www.argentinaprivate.com/forum/showthread.php?p=381435

    But you've outdone yourself with the post below.

    http://www.argentinaprivate.com/forum/showthread.php?p=383419

    Let me see if I understand your contention: BadMan, Joe Fernandez and I conspired to draw attention to the fact that Ana Luna showed this forum to a chica in furtherance of our plan to drive MCSE out of the apartment rental business?

    What's next? Perhaps you'll tell us that Halliburton attacked the World Trade Center so they could get the reconstruction contract?

    ROTFLMAO!

    Thanks,

    Jackson

  4. #129
    Administrator


    Posts: 2556

    Venues: 398
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimito Cartero
    I wonder why Jackson backed off of his long and eloquent post?
    Because sometimes I decide that it's not prudent to add fuel to a fire.

    Thanks,

    Jackson

  5. #128

    Jackson loves to edit

    I wonder why Jackson backed off of his long and eloquent post? If he was wrong, then he should admit it, otherwise it just seems like a big pussy move.

    The BS level on AP is so high, it's no wonder that so many possible contributors are scared off. I shudder as I've read Exon instructing newbies on what to do in BA. I have not said a word, since it seems it's a lost cause.

  6. #127
    Retired Member


    Posts: 2599

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Punter 127
    Ana hasn't had a post (that I can find) in almost a year, and anybody can read the forum without being a member. So what purpose would banning serve?

    If memory serves me not everyone has been banned for this type of thing in the past. It seems to me the reason the "Private Photo Gallery" was created was to avoid this kind of problem, were these photos in the "Private Photo Gallery"?

    Nope, no Ana Luna on the "Private Photo Gallery Access List".

    The first time I remember something like this happening was over some photo that I posted in 2004 of a girl named Maia and another girl who went on to be famous named Vicky, aka Cari, aka Romia Ryan, and who knows what other names. That incident and others eventually led to the creation of the "Private Photo Gallery"

    As I remember the guy that exposed the photos of those chicas was an argentine member and a good friend of an argentine senior member who is a friend of Jackson's (a friend of a friend kind of thing) and I don't believe he was ever banned, I think I still have the emails Jackson sent me explaining that situation and explaining why he didn't want to ban the guy. I understood and agreed with Jackson not banning this guy, and that we needed to find a way to protect our photos, hence the "Private Photo Gallery".

    The only times I remember anyone being banned over photos was when they exposed chicas to photos in the "Private Photo Gallery" I don 't remember anyone being banned over photos posted in the open forum, they may have but I don 't remember it.

    When another member wanted some photos deleted they were instead moved to the "Private Photo Gallery", I wonder why these photos were deleted and not moved.

    Go ahead if you wish and ban Ana who hasn 't had a post in a year, I'm sure it will be a devastating blow and she will aimlessly wonder the streets of Buenos Aires in shame with her head shaved and a big "be" tattooed on her forehead.

    While your at it go ahead and ban Exon for bringing this subject to light, I'm sure he did it for some kind of financial gain, and ban anybody else that dares to disagree with the elitist on this forum, and soon all you will have is your little group of robotic henchmen posting their feckless reports.
    Come on Punter, what I'm really looking for is a second "Strike"

    http://www.indextar.com/ba/buenos-ai...a-l505?cat=349

    Notice we got "No" deinal that BadMan is BadBoy13

    Exon

  7. #126
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1657
    Flopy? As in MCSE's Flopy?

    Quite the reliable source.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails data-lmao.jpg‎  

  8. #125
    Retired Member


    Posts: 2599
    Hi Exon I readed the post on AP about the trouble with this girl.

    flopy_gm@hotmail. Com says:

    I want to tell you that in my opinion you are right.

    flopy_gm@hotmail. Com says:

    'cause the bad competitor is Badman.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I just returned from lunch to find this IM from a girl I know in town.

    It sorta speaks for its self, e-mail her and ask for yourself.

    Exon

  9. 04-29-08 18:37


  10. #124
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1657
    Exon,

    You're an idiot.

    What the hell does MCSE pretending to know random girls and making up wild stories about them, when he in fact doesn't even know them, have anything to do with me or the apartment rental business?

    I am not " joe fernandez," and after reading his grammar, I would say mcse or yourself fit the bill much better than I.

    The dewd got caught making up wild stories about a model he never even met, knew or had a direct conversation with. He posted her pictures on his fake escort website and on the forum. She found out, threatened legal action, he deleted her profile and apologized like a biatch. End of story.

    The only dream being lived out here is the one in this guys imagination.

    None of this has to do with apartments or myself.

    Regards,

    BM

  11. #123

    Question What would be the benefit of banning her?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackson
    Greetings everyone,

    I deleted the photos that were the subject of the controversy because I know who the chick is and I decided to do her a favor.

    However, a more important issue for me was the positive identification of the Forum Traitor who advised this chica that her photos were on the forum, and in fact deliberately showed the photos to the chica.

    The Forum Traitor is no less than our own beloved Ana Luna.

    This begs the question: Should Ana Luna be banned from the forum like every other Forum Traitor in the past?

    Thanks,

    Jackson
    Ana hasn’t had a post (that I can find) in almost a year, and anybody can read the forum without being a member. So what purpose would banning serve?

    If memory serves me not everyone has been banned for this type of thing in the past. It seems to me the reason the “Private Photo Gallery” was created was to avoid this kind of problem, were these photos in the “Private Photo Gallery”?

    Nope, no Ana Luna on the “Private Photo Gallery Access List”.

    The first time I remember something like this happening was over some photos that I posted in 2004 of a girl named Maia and another girl who went on to be famous named Vicky, aka Cari, aka Romia Ryan, and who knows what other names. That incident and others eventually led to the creation of the “Private Photo Gallery”

    As I remember the guy that exposed the photos of those chicas was an argentine member and a good friend of an argentine senior member who is a friend of Jackson’s (a friend of a friend kind of thing) and I don’t believe he was ever banned, I think I still have the emails Jackson sent me explaining that situation and explaining why he didn’t want to ban the guy. I understood and agreed with Jackson not banning this guy, and that we needed to find a way to protect our photos, hence the “Private Photo Gallery”.

    The only times I remember anyone being banned over photos was when they exposed chicas to photos in the “Private Photo Gallery” I don ’t remember anyone being banned over photos posted in the open forum, they may have but I don ’t remember it.

    When another member wanted some photos deleted they were instead moved to the “Private Photo Gallery”, I wonder why these photos were deleted and not moved.

    Go ahead if you wish and ban Ana who hasn ’t had a post in a year, I’m sure it will be a devastating blow and she will aimlessly wonder the streets of Buenos Aires in shame with her head shaved and a big “B” tattooed on her forehead.

    While your at it go ahead and ban Exon for bringing this subject to light, I’m sure he did it for some kind of financial gain, and ban anybody else that dares to disagree with the elitist on this forum, and soon all you will have is your little group of robotic henchmen posting their feckless reports.

  12. #122

    csi not enough?

    Wow, I thought that there were enough CSI commercials on tv without having to wade through chat room drama. Who cares - would assume that they will get filtered out as unreliable information. As far as being labelled as sex tourist guess I have not been lucky / unlucky to be referenced to something like under 18stuff (maybe it 21 in Argentina and do not even know) that from this site so guess will take my chances.

  13. #121
    Retired Member


    Posts: 2599
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Fernandez
    The girl in the photo I know her. And it is known, I am surprised you do not know who is. And these very wrong with what you're saying. You could have a legal problem. If you do not nullify or retracted with what you've said. Already there have been cases like yours in Argentina to people who use images of people known media tv, so to deceive customers.
    I'm going to try and be objective, which I know most of you "XXXXXXXX" won't understand, but then again some of you might. Someone has a "Hidden Agenda" in all this nonsence and I truly think its about money.

    The above message is Joe Fernandez first and only post to this point, thats a given. So why did he post it and whom is he "Shilling" fore.

    First off there are only 4 people that rent apartmrnts on the forum.

    1 Jackson.

    2 Roxana.

    3 MCSE.

    4 BadMan.

    MCSE has a rather "Tacky" way of marketing his apartments, (My opinion only) by raising the rent slightly and throwing in a Chica. The post from "Joe Fernandez plus the e-mail I got from Ana, (which by the way, I never should have posted, it started all of this) seams to imply that anyone renting from MCSE might be investaged as a "Sex Tourist". As most of us know prostitution is not illegal in Argentina, but "Pimping" is. Therefore MCSE might possibly be opperating on the very edge of the law.

    Futhermore BadMan, formally BadBoy13, (Whom I never laid eyes on in my life) is also in the rental business and a competitor of MCSE. With his own website http://www.rentingba.com/

    Whats not generally known is that BadMan and Jackson are business associates and you'll find Jacksons apartments listed on BadMans website,http://www.rentingba.com/apartments-...s_for_rent.htm

    Toymann, I'm in complete agreement with you that BadMan has been a great contributer, but remember he was once BadBoy13 and everyone had problems with him. Once he went into business he changed.

    Now here is my allegation.

    Anything anyone could do to undermine MCSE's apartment renting business, such as even the mention of being a sex tourist would naturally point business in the other direction.

    Finally, there a million more effecient ways of making sure what was sent to Ana Luna, (Allegedly by Joe Fernandez) would be posted on the board. Why not just have Joe Fernandez post it, and why was it send to Ana, and now I have learned "Others"

    Exon

  14. 04-29-08 16:24


  15. #120

    Red face C'Mon Ex. Keep it real!

    As far as questioning Jackson's statement I will not comment, as he is a big boy and can respond for himself.

    Please Ex. Get off of Bad's case. Bad has been argueably AP's most prolific poster as far as quality of chica reviews EVER! Furthermore, I have had many interactions with BAD and he just isn't that kind a guy. You may have a HARD-ON for him but thats your problem. BAD could care less about Ana'a remi business. Seems to me your last shill had a remi business too. You have added many great and enjoyable posts to this board over the years but its seems of late that you're just getting caried away. C'Mon Ex, you need to start keeping it real and get back to the Ex of old. Just my two cents. Happy mongering. Toymann (one of the cocksuckers. LOL)
    Last edited by Toymann; 04-29-08 at 16:13. Reason: spelling

  16. #119
    Quote Originally Posted by Exon123
    Jackson,

    Your absolutely dead wrong about Ana Luna. To start with, what motive could Ana possibly have to do it. Trust me when I say that Ana is only interested in raising her daugher and paying her bills with her Remis business, not causing trouble on your forum.

    Exon
    I am sure Jackson would not have posted that it was Ana Luna, without some strong evidence. Just because she says it was not her, does not mean anything. It really depends on how Jackson found out. If Jackson is sure of his source, then she should be banned.

  17. #118

    Buh-bye Ana Luna!

    I'm sure Jackson just wants validation, but yeah, if she did it, kick her ass out. It's a shame that someone who has been given free preferential access would betray us in this fashion.

    Some guys will believe anything a chica tells them. They think they don't gossip, do underhanded things, or manipulate guys. Perhaps it's just ignorance on the guys part, or maybe they're really just stupid where it concerns women.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape