Thread: American Politics during the Trump Presidency

+ Submit Report
Page 1 of 21 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 306
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #306

  2. #305

    I believe in the Second Amendment, but

    This guy was 19 and was not old enough to buy a hand gun, but could get a AR15.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...mental-n727221

    http://www.scmp.com/news/world/unite...da-high-school

  3. #304

    I'm Not A Racist

    In this article it mentions that Trump paid $85,000 for a full page add. Calling for the death penalty for Five men that attacked a jogger in Central park.

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/...-sfgate-result

  4. #303

    Really you don't care about Your Country Anymore?

    This story was written before it happened, but it did happen at 3 mile island.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078966/?ref_=nv_sr_1

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078966/?ref_=nv_sr_4

    Trump is getting rid of he EPA, to make more money for himself.

    https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa...roposes-repeal

    What about this?

    http://www.history.com/topics/three-mile-island

    https://www.thebalance.com/three-mil...-today-3306337

    Why can’t we find out what happened to these “People of three Mile Island”?

    Congressmen and Senators?

  5. #302

    Not everything you read and see is fact

    This video was selective and not a real representation of what the oil and gas work in North Dakota is like. Yes, some of the things she said and the pictures of the housing are true but it is in the minority. The wages are much higher than she let on. She said she made more money where she came from. If that is true why doesnt she go back there? Generally, wages are much higher in areas that are experiencing Boom Time conditions and harsh work and living environments. Thats why there is such a migration of workers. When the area has this type of influx of people the infrastructure in place cannot immediately accommodate the mass. Which makes living conditions somewhat less than desirable. There is never an immediate fix for this problem. During the same period of time the same was going on the Neuqun province due to Oil & Gas work. If you believe 100% of what she is saying you are naive to the real world.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to GoingSouth For This Post:


  7. #301

    Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

    Trump says the high employment is his doing.

    Here is a lady working at one in North Dakota in the oil industry.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CO9eLksDv6k

  8. #300

    UK News

    How about This One?

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a8055306.html

    Quote Originally Posted by WorldTravel69  [View Original Post]
    Trump keeps saying the networks keep using Fake News about him.

    He spits out Fake News at 5 a day. Since he has been in office he has made over 5000 lies.

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...e-news-tactics

  9. #299

    World traveler--the mag is named the "new yorker" so it must contain only fake news

    You need to understand the logic.

  10. #298

    Fake News 2

    Trump keeps saying the networks keep using Fake News about him.

    He spits out Fake News at 5 a day. Since he has been in office he has made over 5000 lies.

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...e-news-tactics

  11. #297

    Fake News

    I hope you believers of Trump's rant about Fake News watched this or do watch this:

    As I mentioned before Trump's rant about the news is from Putin's play book. "No Freedom of the Press".

    https://www.cbsnews.com/videos/50-years-of-60-minutes/

  12. #296
    Winner 2017 Noob of the year


    Posts: 76
    It is a good reason to have one large pipeline in a remote area as opposed to having more smaller pipelines somewhere more significant. Much less impact than many alternatives when all is said and done. Basically spills somewhere are an unavoidable part of driving cars as opposed to riding in horse and buggy. An unavoidable part of having plastic as opposed to making everything from wood or animal hides. There are not enough tears to cry if you worry about every industrial accident lol. It seems unlikely that choice of political leader would change that. Anyway back to pussy.

    Quote Originally Posted by WorldTravel69  [View Original Post]
    For all you guys that think the Pipeline is a good deal.

    Think again.

    210,000 galleons spilled.

    This is from the TV news station that Putin's Puppet, Trump says is Fake News.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/16/us/key...eak/index.html
    .

  13. #295

    Keystone Pipeline

    For all you guys that think the Pipeline is a good deal.

    Think again.

    210,000 galleons spilled.

    This is from the TV news station that Putin's Puppet, Trump says is Fake News.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/16/us/key...eak/index.html

  14. #294
    Winner 2017 Noob of the year


    Posts: 76
    You're such a pedant. And no that doesn't mean you like little children.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dickhead  [View Original Post]
    Oh shit. I fucked that all up. What I meant to write was, "Most native speakers of English probably can't explain why 'if I was you' is always incorrect.".

    "If I was you" is always incorrect. It has to be "If I were you," because since as JB pointed out, I can never be you and vice versa. Therefore we have a "contrary to fact condition," and that requires the use of the subjunctive mood in both Spanish (where it requires the imperfect subjunctive as in 'yo si fuera vos') and English. In English the present subjunctive, both singular and plural, would be 'were' and the past form would be 'had been.' In the indicative mood, 'were' is indeed plural.

    That was a pretty bad typo on my part. I apologize profusely and will now take myself outside and slap myself around some.

    Fuck me.
    .

  15. #293
    Oh shit. I fucked that all up. What I meant to write was, "Most native speakers of English probably can't explain why 'if I was you' is always incorrect.".

    "If I was you" is always incorrect. It has to be "If I were you," because since as JB pointed out, I can never be you and vice versa. Therefore we have a "contrary to fact condition," and that requires the use of the subjunctive mood in both Spanish (where it requires the imperfect subjunctive as in 'yo si fuera vos') and English. In English the present subjunctive, both singular and plural, would be 'were' and the past form would be 'had been.' In the indicative mood, 'were' is indeed plural.

    That was a pretty bad typo on my part. I apologize profusely and will now take myself outside and slap myself around some.

    Fuck me.

  16. #292
    Winner 2017 Noob of the year


    Posts: 76
    For one thing you could never be me lol. For another, were is plural (If I was you is correct).

    Quote Originally Posted by Dickhead  [View Original Post]
    Most native speakers of English probably can't explain why 'if I were you' is always incorrect. Right?
    .

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape