Thread: From 1st World to 3rd World!
+
Submit Report
Results 1 to 15 of 26
-
05-11-10 22:40 #26Senior Member

Posts: 102This is really well said, by a newbie contributor.
Originally Posted by Tyrell
Apart from this, I'm afraid this thread had deteriorated considerably, and I wouldn't mind seeing it die. It started as a question of world history. It has degenerated into a thumbs up or thumbs down form on the Argentine economy, or the Argentine psyche in general, and I'm not loving this trend.
BTG
-
05-11-10 22:30 #25Senior Member

Posts: 286I respectfully disagree with this philosophy. Who is the winner: somebody who dominates other people? Who is the looser? Somebody who doesn't care what other people do or think? Was Mozart a looser (he died alone and in total povertry) Was Rockefeller a winner? Is power, or money, or domination the unique value accepted by everybody that gives sense and justifies a life? Many other points of view are equally acceptable about reality and a possible positive action would be to confront these in a civilized manner. By accepting this philosophy as the unique that is acceptable, there would a risk (or intention) of justifying domination: "some people are poor because they don't work hard, or are not fit enough to survive in the natural scenario of Darwinian competition". This view, common in some societies but not in others, is a way of avoiding discussing the moral aspects that Goethe exposed as soon as freedom became a reality in Europe in his Dr. Faust. My own phylosophy is to live and let people live without my judment. The root of many of these subjects, in my opinion too important to be avoided of an continous discussion, are to be found in the reason for the Reformation, which in my view is the founding stone of capitalism.
Originally Posted by Jackson
-
05-11-10 03:41 #24Administrator

Posts: 2556
Venues: 398Fernando22 was just repeating the same tired diatribe, which amounts to this: The world's losers are jealous of the world's winners, and thus they salivate over the prospects of banding together and taking by government fiat that which they could not earn themselves in a competitive environment.
Originally Posted by Tyrell
No threat really, because the losers are losers and thus generally incapable of organizing to a level necessary to represent any credible threat to the winners. However, the cool thing about losers is that if any of them actually get off their asses and begin producing their own wealth, then they too become winners and begin to see their former colleagues for what they really are: Losers.
Jackson
-
05-10-10 19:37 #23Regular Member

Posts: 4If the Argentinan economic system wasn't so corrupt and if Kirchner wasn't such a stupid *****, Argentinas exchange rate would be around the same as Brazils. And as a monger, I don't really want that.
After all, there's a reason that you come to Argentina and not Chile or the sex mecca that is Brazil.
Yes, like a shoe factory owner, I look for the countries with favorable exchange rates, and a good amount of cheap, exploitable local "talent".
Brazil has the talent en masse, but the exchange rate is horrible. Currently 1. 78=$1
Most of Chiles "talented" sex workers are from other contries. That's because they get paid a lot more in chile than in any other S. American country.
Only Argentina has the favorable exchange rate, and a great pool of 22yr olds who are willing to suck and swallow.
This is directly because of the corrupt politicians and bad populist policies, that you speak so badly of. Just try going to Sweden and getting a smoking hot 22yr old blondie to suck and fuck you for $85-$100 an hour.
So you see, even YOU can support left wing policies. I'm just waiting for Kirchner to do something else stupid so that the exchange will go up to 4. 50 =$1.
-
05-10-10 19:15 #22Regular Member

Posts: 4Cut Fernando22 some slack
You guys have to understand where Fernando22 is coming from. He's not really talking to the majority of the members of this forum. He's actually just talking to (yelling at) the minority yet very vocal right wing / tea party members of this forum. While small, they are a belligerent group, ready to yell from their luxury condo apartments in Recoleta about just how stupid the Argentinians really are. Although no one on the street would hear them, because all Americans live in the penthouse. This particular topic was started just to discuss just how shitty Argentina has become (riches to rags---really? So don't be surprised when an actual Argentinian comes to defend his country. Yes, he's coming from a leftist POV, and yes he doesn't actually have much ammunition to work with (besides the women and the architecture) But you still have to respect a man who is trying to verbally defend his countries honor. Especially when it's from a bunch of guys whos' only reason for going there is to fuck the women.
And lets face it, those rich tea partiers are comically extreme on so many ways. They're the right wing version of loud angry lesbian feminazis. Too extreme to even try negotiating with. And just like the mannish lesbos, if someone have the gaul to actually disagree with them, you can see the pure anger building up in them in their eyes. (As a NYC Democrat, I fucking hate what the mannish lesbians are doing to Manhattan politics. At least you can actually negotiate and joke around with the gay guys. The right wingers on this forum are idiological to the extreme, even when the particulars of a situation are to everyones benefit (health care reform--bail out package)
Except when it comes to going to another country to pay to fuck women. Then "life is full of moral uncertainties."
P. S. Jackson, it's great to see that you are a libertarian, theoretically, I would be one too. Unfortunately, I have discovered that within the last few years in America, in many rural states, the Libertarian party has been infiltrated with hardcore racist, militia movement characters. Many of who are bent on military revolution (and are incidentally great friends with the tea party movement) Being that I'm black, I understandably cannot join such a crowd. Just a warning, that when you say you're a Libertarian now, this is a vision that goes through many peoples heads
-
05-03-10 19:38 #21Senior Member

Posts: 1889Tell me about it
Had all this stuff come up in a couple of M & A transactions here. The labor audit is one of the key due diligence areas. If the seller improperly severed some worker years ago, no doubt that worker will be looking for the new owner to pay him. Even if all past layoffs were done properly, when news of the deal gets out, the line starts forming. If you inherit an employee who has been with the company for 12 years, you must account for paying him one year in severance if and when that occurs.
Originally Posted by Damman
If you own an argie biz that you'd like to sell to an international buyer, you need to groom your headcount on your own, prior to putting it up for sale, in order to reduce some of the inevitable overhang that employment issues will cause.
-
05-03-10 17:35 #20Senior Member

Posts: 374Unions
http://www.heritage.org/index/country/argentinaInflexible labor regulations continue to hinder employment creation and productivity growth. The non-salary cost of employing a worker is high, and dismissing a redundant employee can be costly.
There are probably few political issues that El Alamo / Jackson and I agree on, but this Union thing in Argentina is one. My sweet thang does the salaries for a few enterprises and the so called benefits / perks workers receive is mind boggling for me. Workers receive extra pay if they have children. Think it is about 200 peso a month for each kid. Another perk, an extra month's pay every six months. Fourteen months pay for twelve months work. There is also mandatory severance pay, one month's salary for each year worked. And trying to fire an employee is like going through a divorce in the USA. Courts, lawyers are all involved. Termination does not happen. Do not know how anyone can do business in Argentina. It is entirely the Argentine's business how they wish to run their country, but damn guys, you are shooting yourselves in the foot.
It is crazy. Cablevision needed to change my cable box. I had to make an appointment one month in advance to get this done. Cablevision told me they could not do it any sooner because of the workload. The day of the appointment, three guys show up. One guy carrying the new box, one guy to change the plugs and the other guy carried the old box out. Fuck me. I am still scratching my ass on that event. All you can do is laugh.
-
05-02-10 23:33 #19Senior Member

Posts: 286My vision on this is that Argentina never was a first world country. The GNP per capita alone is not a good measure for deciding that. At the beginning of the XXth century, Argentina was effectively part of Commonwealth, providing beef for the UK. The structure of the society was similar to that of the South in the US before the Civil War (no industry, agriculture and food based economy) In my opinion, no developed society can arise under those conditions.
Originally Posted by TejanoLibre
Industralization started late, basically during the first goverment of Peron in 1945. This basic industry was intended for internal comsumption and not for exporting. Anyway, that basic industry got promoted during the late 50's and early 60's (Frondizi was the president that pushed the most for heavy industralization). Among those local industries was the development of nuclear energy following a plan of slow breeding reactors (not useful for nuclear weapons).
During the late 60 's local brands of cars were produced (Rastrojero, Torino) That development went on until 1976, when the military took power. The most important issue was the changing of the economic profile of Argentina, forcing it to go back to its early role of food-producing country with no industry. I've seen hundreds of small, family type and larger, industries closing down between 1976 and 1978. To make a long story short, that plan was successful, and Argentina got de-industrialized. This change was welcomed by several economic actors that got greatly benefited from it (e.g. finance, banks, cattle owners), and got the middle class as the great looser, because its wealth was tied to the local industry that employed a large number of people. Similar changes happened in other countries at the same time (late 70's), e.g., in Turkey. Brazil never went into this change, and kept with a slow but steady industralization.
Today in Argentina this debate is still opened: will this country follow the path of Brazil or that of Paraguay (no industry whatsoever, everything is imported). And I would like to add that the composition of the society in 1975 had 80 % of middle class people, employed (mainly by the industry) workers and professionals, by far the largest of Latin America, with good free public health and education systems. Most of the middle class at the time had a tendendy to cultivate cultural values as well, and for that reason one can find today so many used books and long play stores. Moreover, Argentina has gotten 5 Nobel Prize winners, 3 of them in Sciences, and basically two that carried their work locally.
That's my two cents on this.
-
05-02-10 23:11 #18Senior Member

Posts: 286Please, don't include me on this. According to my own experience, lack of ethics is to be found everywhere in the world and expresses itself in different forms. Please, think it twice before making unfare generalizations.
Originally Posted by Argento
-
05-02-10 22:54 #17Senior Member

Posts: 366Bashing or bullshitting?
I am not the greatest admirer of Argentinos, in or out of Argentina. Their economic situation is self-inflicted, on-going and seems to be insoluble. So it is a bit difficult to tell the verifyable truth without being negative. Their personal lack of ethics are the stuff of legend and in general, this naturally extends into their business, politics and religious life. So I support Jackson in not allowing vile inaccuracies to be posted about Argentinos. Hell, I think it should be extended and include pleasant inaccuracies to be wiped from the forum as well. I read more bullshit that seeks to cast the Argentinos in a good light than what is posted that denigrates them.
Originally Posted by Jackson
Argento
-
05-02-10 15:26 #16Administrator

Posts: 2556
Venues: 398I wouldn't permit anything as vile and as inaccurate as this to be said about the Argentinos either:
Originally Posted by Lysander
Originally Posted by Fernando22
-
05-02-10 15:21 #15Administrator

Posts: 2556
Venues: 398Julio,
Originally Posted by Julio
1. Fernando22 in NOT an Argentino, he's European.
2. Spoil what? According to Fernando22, nobody "enters this forum" anymore anyway, including the 95 people that are signed on right now.
3. But that's the great thing about America! The fact is that we've built a country wherein even the less productive of us can still achieve a good standard of living, as opposed to many other countries (like Argentina), where an appalling lack of opportunity results in a situation where very few of it's citizens can advance themselves economically. And they think we should follow their model?
Originally Posted by Julio
Do you get this? Because many people don't, including every socialist I've ever met.
4. El Alamo is entirely accurate in his observations of the unions in Argentina, who are the country's biggest hindrance to growth with their mindset against allowing Argentina to develop a dynamic labor market to compete in the 21st century. The fact is that the unions have created an environment wherein a relatively small number of people have relatively good, well protected jobs at the expense of the majority who have no jobs. How very "European" of them.
Thanks,
Jackson
-
05-02-10 13:39 #14Senior Member

Posts: 76
Originally Posted by Fernando22
What's the idiot point here? I don't see it.
Originally Posted by Jackson
Agree 100%.
Originally Posted by Lysander
If smartness is getting the best profit of environment and the place you're living, looks like some members of this forum are enclosed into a cellar in the Middle Ages. As Fernando pointed out, Rocky's or El Queso perspective towards SIDA or Global Warming, or El Alamo's approach to Unions correspond better to a Neanderthal environment than to a science and humanist society. I always thought some of you guys had been inmensely lucky to been born in a developped country, if not you probably be draggin a cart along the streets of a Third World city.
Contrary on what many of you may think, I had great respect for the United States. Some of the writers I admire most are americans, I like very much its cinema. I think it's a great country, with great ideals spoiled in the last times by an irrational desire for money. An ambition out of proportion that submerge a lot of good qualities they have.
This forum is not the better example of culture, I know.
But at least I hope may be a good source of information (if for once you cease to confront with the ones who give hosting to you, then, as Fernando and Lysander rightly point out, some Argentines may want to share some valuable datum with you), and also a source of free expresion like it was until now.
Don't spoil it banning a member just because he wrote something you don't like.
-
05-02-10 11:54 #13Senior Member

Posts: 227Argentina bashing posts as well?
Fair enough, but by the same token should you not also delete posts which bash Argentina. Argentina has many faults, but this forum is supposed to be about P4P and associated topics (apartments, food, fishing etc) and not about politics. I agree with Fernando on at least one thing, that allowing ill-informed Argie bashing posts probably does deter Argentinian contributors to this forum and thus deprives us of some useful local experiences and information about the P4p scene.
Originally Posted by Jackson
Lysander
-
05-01-10 19:22 #12Administrator

Posts: 2556
Venues: 398Guys,
Originally Posted by Fernando22
Why do you even bother to respond to idiots like this?
Anyway, unlike my competitor's forum, I don't permit people to use my forum to openly bash my country, so I will be deleting Fernando22's Eurotrash comments within 24 hours, and I'm only waiting that long out of respect for the guys who did respond to this moron.
In the mean time, please refrain from responding to his drivel.
Thanks,
Jackson
==================================================
For the record, I am NOT a Republican, and I am NOT a conservative.
- I am against the death penalty.
- I am against any government support of religious organizations.
- I am for the legalization of recreational drugs.
- I am for the legalization of commercial sex.
- I am for a woman's right to choose.
- I am for comprehensive sex education.
- I am for a foreign guest worker program.
- I am for a universal flat tax on EVERYONE'S income.
- I am for health INSURANCE reform.
- I am for health JUSTICE reform.
I am a member of the Libertian Party, registered as an Independent.


Reply With Quote