Thread: American Politics during the Trump Presidency
+
Submit Report
Results 406 to 420 of 520
-
12-07-16 12:53 #115
Posts: 2700Post #35
This is part of same article as I posted way back when.
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/mich.../11/id/758427/
Originally Posted by Doppelganger [View Original Post]
-
12-07-16 09:55 #114
Posts: 912Watch and Learn
I ask all my liberal / progressive brothers here on the board to watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbjPJsqvLjo
-
12-04-16 21:22 #113
Posts: 329Originally Posted by BigBossMan [View Original Post]
-
12-04-16 17:13 #112
Posts: 313Invasion of a troll
Originally Posted by Xanadu [View Original Post]
On second thought, go to hell.
Don B.
-
12-04-16 15:21 #111
Posts: 707I wish Sanders and Palin would keep their mouths shut? Trump doing the work of a mayor or governor does not hurt anything and gives him a good photo op. Today he is back onto the 35% tariffs. Weirdly, I think the agricultural senators will join with the coastal senators to prevent it. Here's Sasse's comment. "Pres-Elect Trump means well. But won't his 35% tariff idea raise prices on American families? How would it not be a new 35% tax on families?".
-
12-04-16 10:17 #110
Posts: 18Originally Posted by DonB [View Original Post]
-
12-04-16 02:12 #109
Posts: 313Why?
Originally Posted by Xanadu [View Original Post]
Don B.
-
12-03-16 19:40 #108
Posts: 18Originally Posted by Tres3 [View Original Post]
-
12-03-16 15:22 #107
Posts: 746Originally Posted by Xanadu [View Original Post]
-
12-03-16 01:10 #106
Posts: 577You Appear Misguided
Originally Posted by Xanadu [View Original Post]
Tres3.
-
12-02-16 22:29 #105
Posts: 18Originally Posted by AllIWantIsLove [View Original Post]
To state that "There is no government money. There is only taxpayer money." is a conflation of the source of funds (taxes) with spending authority (government). Taxpayer monies collected by government and deposited into government coffers indeed become government funds to be statutorily used by government for the benefit of its citizens / residents as was done in the case of Carrier in Indianapolis.
-
12-02-16 14:42 #104
Posts: 313Function of government
Originally Posted by WorldTravel69 [View Original Post]
On the subject of individual rights, in all of the debates leading up to the nominations and the election, I did not hear the phrase "individual rights" uttered even once.
The progressive/leftists are all for minority rights, the smallest minority is the individual, so if you are in favor of minority rights why are you not in favor of individual rights?
Don B.
-
12-02-16 13:47 #103
Posts: 746Originally Posted by Doppelganger [View Original Post]
-
12-02-16 13:36 #102
Posts: 2700Carrier
It gets better.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/w...223106708.html
Also, What prevents other Companies from saying that they going to move out of the country just to get our money, but not really intending to move?
Originally Posted by Doppelganger [View Original Post]
-
12-02-16 10:37 #101
Posts: 912Conservative Vs Liberal/Progressive
Originally Posted by Rhumm2000 [View Original Post]
Who exactly do you think pays the taxes that Liberals/Progressives want to give away for "Social Justice" - the people who go to work everyday and the corporations and small businesses that employ them.
So what if the state gave Carrier tax breaks, its not like they wrote them a check for that amount. No they just REDUCED their tax burden. Tax reduction, the absolute boogieman for Liberals/Progressives. No wonder Trump scares them so much with his talk of reducing both corporate and personal tax rates as well as simplifying the tax code.
Not mention both Carrier and their employees will continue to pay taxes to the state to help replenish those funds.
A much better solution than writing checks to the welfare crowd who contribute nothing and are a drag on the economy.