Thread: Argentine Economy
+
Submit Report
Results 826 to 840 of 1611
-
02-17-09 16:11 #786
Posts: 1657Another thing I have noticed about working girls is they usually start off charging very little and seeing many clients.
It seems as time goes by, the smarter ones try to gradually raise their prices while cutting down on the quantity of clients they see and raising the quality of client they see.
I have seen this work for many chicas.
There is a chica I know who started off in a PV, making about $ 100 AR an hour. She became independent, raised her prices to cover her new overhead. Now she is independent, makes the same amount of money, has a higher level of clientele and she has to sleep with much less people.
After seeing all this first hand I don't knock her for her decision, I think she made the right choice.
Regards,
BM.
-
02-17-09 16:02 #785
Posts: 2470Goeth before a fall
Originally Posted by Jackson
-
02-17-09 15:44 #784
Posts: 2556
Venues: 398Originally Posted by El Queso
Thanks,
Jackson
-
02-17-09 15:30 #783
Posts: 1657ha ha
Only in Argentina would there be a hookers union.
Regards,
BM
Wait. Did that really happen?
Originally Posted by Daddy Rulz
-
02-17-09 13:34 #782
Posts: 2808Interesting story
Originally Posted by El Queso
Thanks for the improved translations, I was wondering about that "lower self" I thought maybe it refered to vice itself, like they didn't have to lower prices because the "lower self" of the men would pay.
-
02-17-09 13:19 #781
Posts: 552
Venues: 8I never realized there was an association for prostitutes (AMMAR) I don't know what power they have, but just had never heard of it before. I wonder how many chicas know about it and how many are members? The girls I know have never heard of it.
However, I found an interesting part of the article that Facundo presented:
"¿Será este año más difícil para las trabajadoras sexuales?", preguntó lanacion. Com. "Ya lo es. Estamos muy preocupadas. Es importante que el Gobierno nos atienda y resuelva los problemas que tenemos".
First, the translation that Google provides automatically is not quite right (I found much worse in other places) It kind of doesn't make sense the way it was translated. It said:
"Is this year more difficult for sex workers?" Asked lanacion. Com. "It is. We are very worried. It is important that we provide and the government solve the problems we have."
The translation is more like (unless I'm missing a point of idiom that I don't understand):
"Will this year be more difficult for the sex workers?" asked lanacion. Com. "It already is. We are very worried. It is important that the government attend to us and resolve the problems that we have."
I just find it interesting the attitude that EVERY LEVEL of worker here in Argentina seems to have that the government take care of them.
Towards the end of the article they do talk about price reductions, but up at the top when they were talking about AMMAR, one of the "titulares" of that organization said:
""Las chicas se quedan sin trabajo y las que tienen trabajos tienen salarios miserables", dijo y subrayó que presiona para que no se reduzcan los precios de los servicios prestados porque eso es "bajar la autoestima"."
Translation:
"Girls are left without work and those that have work have miserable salaries," she said and stressed that she pressures that they don't reduce the prices of the services provided because that is "to lower self esteem."
The Google transalation was:
""The girls are left without jobs and those jobs have wages," he said and stressed that no pressure to reduce prices of services provided because it is "lower self"."
Terrible, terrible translation!
However, I find it interesting that the head prostitute is telling prostitutes not to lower their prices because that will lower their self esteem - I wonder what their self esteem is like when their ribs are sticking out and they are begging for food in the street. Those "in power" here, at most levels, just don't understand economics in even a basic way.
At one point there was mention that prostitute wages were pretty good. Why doesn't the head prostitute say something like "the girls should know that their bodies and the economy won't necessarily last forever and we have been urging them for years to save their money for times like these. It is unfortunate that so many will be affected by this because they make better wages in some cases than so-called professionals in this country and a little foresight would have gone a long way to preventing this problem. Because the demand has been so drastically reduced, I think that many of the girls who cannot make it on their own should return to their country of origin and remove some of the burden from Argentina that they will surely cause when they are out of work and sucking on the government tit."
-
02-17-09 12:14 #780
Posts: 2599Originally Posted by Facundo
Exon
Takes a while to load
http://translate.google.com/translat...istory_state0=
-
02-16-09 22:59 #779
Posts: 216Originally Posted by Jackjack1
-
02-16-09 22:33 #778
Posts: 114Laws of Supply and Demand
Originally Posted by Facundo
Seems that there is a ton of supply, not as much demand, yet chica prices are increasing. I don't understand.
Jack
-
02-16-09 19:43 #777
Posts: 216The sale of sex is down 50% in Buenos Aires
La Nación today reported that the purchase or "activity of sex in privados fell 50%". There is widespread concern that many of the working girls will fall below th poverty line. The article states this is in keeping with the rest of the economy in Argentina which is also falling.
http://www.lanacion.com.ar/nota.asp?...52277&toi=6262
-
02-11-09 18:25 #776
Posts: 474Argentine Farming Issues
Here's another from the Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123430877724170335.html
The title of this one says its about Latin America and commodities, but the vast majority of the article is about Argentine farmers and the dysfunctional relationship they have with the government in general, and the Kirchners in particular. There's a quote in there from Cristina where she characterizes soybeans as 'little more than a weed.' That is probably the best indication of the contempt she has for farmers and it's astonishing when one considers that 1/10th of the government's revenue came from soybeans via export taxes.
You have to feel a tiny bit for the farmers if they are compared relative to their peers in other nations. The US and Canada subsidize soy bean production while Argentina taxes the heck out of it. I know there are other factors -- including the fact that its much cheaper to grow in Argentina, at least when there's rain -- but it does seem partially true when the writer asserts that the Kirchners are paying for their populist policies on the backs of farmers. Not this year they won't, and that will spell trouble for CFK. Do you think she'll take responsibility for bungling the strike last year, or will she blame it on foreigners? Hmmmmmm. Tough call there, but perhaps the pension seizure offers an initial clue.
-
02-09-09 22:19 #775
Posts: 995And yet, they continue to push raises for unions.
-
02-09-09 17:02 #774
Posts: 746Argentina On The Cusp Of A Recession - Di Tella
-
02-05-09 15:09 #773
Posts: 366Thanks.
Originally Posted by Stan Da Man
Argento
-
02-05-09 12:46 #772
Posts: 2470Originally Posted by Chanel